ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

David Icke More Fully Exposed as Secret Society Agent for the Pope of Rome

Amplify’d from www.vaticanassassins.org

David Icke More Fully Exposed as Secret Society Agent for the Pope of Rome

David Icke, Conspiracy Theorist and Agent of the Jesuit Papacy, 2010

Some time ago, your Editor viewed a video from Craig Oxley’s Unhived Mind in which anti-christ, anti-English Reformation Bible David Icke forcefully denied that the Pope of Rome was involved in the Great Conspiracy for World Government of which Icke “attacks.”  William Cooper, Craig Oxley and a few other responsible students of Satan’s “mystery of iniquity” have outed David Icke as a liar and Masonic agent for the very secret societies he “exposes.”  In “adding to the cart,” Joe has sent your Editor a series of videos that do a fine job in further revealing Icke’s telling associations and “hand signs.”

Read more at www.vaticanassassins.org
 

Break one Commandment Break All


TSA on Saturday Night Live | Burn Down the Freaking Mission


Mad cows eye their evil side by glaring from their left eye

Amplify’d from www.couriermail.com.au



Mad cows eye their evil side by glaring from their left eye



  • Brian Williams
cow


ARE you glaring at me? Research indicates it's best to avoid the the left eye of a cow. Picture: Anthony Weate
Source: The Courier-Mail



HAVING the boss give you the evil eye is bad enough but scientists have found that graziers cop it even worse - cattle give them the big glare.

And researcher Andrew Robins warns cattle handlers that if a cow is stressed or agitated, the left side is probably not the right place to be.

Dr Robins and Professor Clive Phillips from the University of Queensland have studied cattle to find out if they prefer to view a potential threat with their left or right eye.

Their research could have significant benefits in livestock welfare and production, not to mention that fact that there are few people working with cattle who have not been put through the rails by a cranky beast.

Dr Robins said colloquial evidence was that a stroppy cow was more likely to view their potential victim with the left eye or strike with the left horn. But socialisation or domestication provided anomalies. Many domestic animals were handled from the left or near side - such as horses - and it was thought that these animals might relax because they saw the human as a surrogate herd member.

Professor Phillips said that the idea fitted with the hypothesis that the brain's right hemisphere was used to perceive danger.

The right side of the brain - which generally processes information from the left eye - was more concerned with immediate, real-life situations and had developed to be vigilant for change.

"We're pretty sure that with dogs it's the same way,'' Prof Phillips said.

"We think this is how it works across a lot of species.''

Dr Robins said the left eye and left side of our face tended to communicate more extreme emotional responses such as aggression; and people tended to hold babies on their left side, making it easier to pick up emotional information.

Russian researchers concluded that productivity differences in dairy cattle were related to lateralisation in the right side of the brain's control of the sympathetic nervous system, which co-ordinated milk let-down and flight or fight response.

Dr Robins and Prof Phillips found cattle consistently viewed potential threats with their left eye, which meant they were choosing to analyse the threat with the right side of their brain.


"In all species studied, from fish to mammals, there is a consistent pattern of specialised functions carried out on either side of the brain,'' Dr Robins said.
Read more at www.couriermail.com.au
 

Engineered DNA device could coax cells to differentiate - or die - on demand

Bespoke genetic circuits rewire human cells

Engineered DNA device could coax cells to differentiate - or die - on demand.

Nature

By Ewen Callaway

Biologists have constructed a programmable genetic "circuit" that can rewire cells to respond on demand to just about any signal desired. One version of the circuit makes human cells susceptible to an antiviral drug--but only if they are making abnormal amounts of a protein implicated in cancer.

The technique could have a wide range of uses, for example coaxing stem cells to transform into different tissues once inside the body or making plants activate a defense program in response to low nutrients.

"The broad idea here is being able to control cellular behavior and cellular decisions in response to potentially any protein of interest," says Christina Smolke, a bioengineer at Stanford University in California, who led the new study, published online November 25 in Science.

The main challenge in controlling how cells behave has been how to tap into cellular pathways. To do this, Smolke and her team constructed a stretch of DNA that acts as genetic circuit. When inserted into cells and transcribed into RNA, the circuit encodes its protein product only when it senses the presence or absence of a particular target protein inside the cell.

For example, the team created a circuit containing the gene for an enzyme that renders cells sensitive to the antiviral drug ganciclovir. They inserted a stop signal into the gene sequence, which prevents the cell from using the resulting messenger RNA to produce a working protein. But next to the stop signal they encoded a short stretch of RNA--an aptamer--that recognizes a signaling protein called beta-catenin, which is overproduced by some tumors. When the aptamer binds its target, it causes the cell to splice the messenger RNA in a way that removes the stop signal, allowing enzyme production.

Deadly device

To test their circuit, the researchers stimulated human cells to produce extra beta-catenin--as if they were cancer cells --then treated them with ganciclovir. Cells that contained the circuits were killed by the drug.

"This is very clever, beautiful work," says Wendell Lim, a synthetic biologist at the University of California, San Francisco.

In theory, the circuit could contain any gene, and aptamers can be designed to recognize any protein. By tweaking the "wiring" of such circuits, they could make cells respond to either the presence or absence of a desired protein, says Smolke. Including more than one aptamer sensor on the same circuit could even allow researchers to trigger different responses to different combinations of proteins.

Adam Arkin, a systems and synthetic biologist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, says the new technique is a breakthrough because of its flexibility. Other efforts to commandeer cell signaling have tended to be "one-offs of bespoke engineering", he says, whereas Smolke's circuit can be used to tap into a wide range of biological pathways in different types of cells.

Cell-hacking circuits are years away from the clinic, but Smolke thinks they could eventually be combined with other experimental treatments to control where and when they act within the body. For example, pluripotent stem cells capable of generating a range of tissues could be instructed to respond to protein cues within the body that cause them to differentiate into the desired one. Cancer-killing immune cells could contain circuits that keep them from attacking healthy cells.

"If we got good at gene therapy, then you could imagine these sophisticated sensing systems that would only deliver the kill or the gene when it's in the exact right location," agrees Arkin.

Read more at www.scientificamerican.com
 

Video: TSA Song: HELP YOU MAKE IT TO YOUR FLIGHT

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com

HELP YOU MAKE IT TO YOUR FLIGHT - Buck Howdy

Buck Howdy pokes back at the TSA for all their poking, prodding and patting down. You can hear the song at http://BuckHowdy.BandCamp.com - it's also coming soon to iTunes.

Buck's website is http://www.BuckHowdy.com

Read more at www.youtube.com
 

HELP YOU MAKE IT TO YOUR FLIGHT - Buck Howdy

The Case Against Hell: Does It Really Exist? Come hell or high water let’s find out

Amplify’d from www.arcticbeacon.com

The Case Against Hell: Does It Really Exist?

Come hell or high water let’s find out
By Greg Szymanski, JD

Nov. 25, 2010

Everyone is going to Hell unless they do this or that.


The world, of course, is always going to Hell in a hand basket, especially

during slow economic times.


And organized religion plays the ‘Hell Card’ quite well, using it like a card

shark who knows the biblical deck is stacked in his favor.


The Vatican damns you to Hell if you do not follow the Pope.


Christian religious leaders damn you to Hell if you are not saved by the

blood of Jesus or listen to Billy Graham sermons.


And, interestingly enough, they all use interpretations of Bible

scripture to back up claims that Hell really exists.


However, are the Bible interpretations correct?


In an article by Mercy Aiken from Tentmaker Ministries, here is what

he found, in part, about the case against the existence of Hell:


The case against Hell:


Did you know that there is a solid scriptural case to be made against the

idea of Hell? Many non-Christians have

rejected the concept of Hell, but it may come as a surprise to learn

that there is a growing number of Bible-believing Christians who also

reject the notion-not in spite of Scripture but because of it! This

short study is meant only to raise some questions and provide brief

answers. For further study, please refer to the links at the end of the

article.


An open and unbiased study of the Bible, including many key Greek and

Hebrew words as well as Church history will reveal some surprising

things.


For instance, did you know that….


“Hell” Is Not an Old Testament doctrine:


Popular myth : Hell is an established Biblical doctrine that is in the

Bible from start to finish. This is not true! Two thirds of the Bible

(the Old Testament) does not mention Hell at all. (“Sheol,” the Old

Testament word that is sometimes translated as Hell, only means “grave”

by definition, and it is where everyone in the Old Testament went when

they died–good or evil, Jew or Gentile). Thus the Old Testament does

not contain the concept of Hell!


Think about it…


If Hell is real, why didn’t God make that warning plain right at the

beginning of the Bible? God said the penalty for eating of the tree of

Knowledge of Good and Evil was death- -not “eternal life” in fire and

brimstone.


If Hell is real, why wasn’t Cain warned about it, or Sodom and Gomorrah

, or any of those who committed the earliest recorded “sins?”


If Hell is real why didn’t Moses warn about this fate in the Ten

Commandments or the Mosaic Covenant consisting of over 600 laws,

ordinances, and warnings? The Mosaic Law simply stated blessings and

cursings in this lifetime.


If Hell is real, why are its roots in paganism, rather than the Bible?

Many nations surrounding Israel in the Old Testament believed in

Hell-like punishment in the afterlife, for they served bloodthirsty and

evil “gods,” while Israel simply taught the grave (sheol) and a hope of

a resurrection. If Hell is real, why was the revelation of it first

given to pagan nations, instead of God’s covenant people? Did God expect

Israel to learn about the afterlife from the Pagan Gentiles? If so, why

did He repeatedly warn Israel to not learn of their ways?


If Hell is real, why did God tell the Jews that burning their children

alive in the fire to the false god Molech, (in the valley of Gehenna )

was so detestable to Him? God said that such a thing “never even entered

His mind” (Jer. 32:35). How could God say such a thing to Israel , if He

has plans to burn alive a good majority of His own creation in a

spiritual and eternal Gehenna of His own making?


**FACT: The King James Bible erroneously translates the word “Sheol” as

Hell a total of 31 times in the Old Testament, thus setting a foundation

for that doctrine in the New Testament as well as the majority of Bible

translations to follow the KJV. Even so, most new translations have

completely eliminated Hell from the Old Testament, as honest and better

scholarship has demanded. The Jewish version of the Old Testament (the

Tanakh) has no concept of Hell in it. The importance of this fact cannot

be over-emphasized. If a doctrine does not appear as seed form in the

books of the Law, the Prophets and the Psalms, it cannot fairly be

taught as a major biblical doctrine, if indeed it can be taught as

biblical at all!


Hell Is Not a New Testament Doctrine:


Popular myth: Jesus spoke of Hell more than He did of Heaven. This is

not true! Jesus warned the Jews many times of impending destruction,

both nationally and individually. He used several different terms to

refer to punishment/destruction, some of which were erroneously

translated as the same word, “Hell” by Bible translators. We do not deny

that God will indeed judge the whole world, nor do we wish to make light

of His judgments. We are challenging the belief that His judgment on sin

and unbelief is eternal torment/Hell and never-ending separation from

God. Certainly, Jesus spent a lot of his ministry warning people to

repent or reap the consequences, (particularly “Gehenna.”) But could we

be reading more into His warnings than He originally intended?


Think about it…….


If Hell is real, why were most of the warnings pertaining to

punishment/Gehenna directed to Israel , particularly the Lord’s own

disciples as well as the Pharisees? The first great cluster of

references to Gehenna, are found in the Sermon on the Mount (Mat 5:22,

29, 30), Jesus’ great sermon to His disciples in which He warned that

one was in danger of Gehenna for the likes of calling someone a fool.

This is a far cry from our modern Evangelical interpretation that says

not accepting Jesus as your Savior is what sends someone to Hell. Are we

perhaps missing the symbolism that Jesus originally intended?


If Hell is real, aren’t we taking verses out of context when we warn

non-Jewish sinners who are not part of the Mosaic covenant God made with

the nation of Israel about consequences for sin which have nothing to do

with them since they are not under that covenant?


Since the concept of Hell doesn’t exist in the Old Testament, how could

Jesus and his disciples teach that salvation was deliverance from a

place that is not even found in their Scriptures? And if He was

introducing the subject for the first time, why did He do it so

casually, as though His listeners already understood what He was talking

about?


If Hell is real, since some English translations use the word Hell for

the Greek word “Gehenna,” in the New Testament, why didn’t this same

place (Gehenna) get translated Hell in the many places where it appears

in the Hebrew form “ga ben Hinnom” in the Old Testament?


If the Jews did not understand “Gehenna” as a symbol of everlasting

torture, but rather as a place of shame, filth, and defilement (where

Israel participated in the grossest form of idol worship), why does

modern theology ascribe more to the word than the original meaning did?

The teaching of Gehenna has evolved in Jewish teachings to include

punishment in the afterlife; but even today, Gehenna still does not mean

“endless” punishment to the Jews.


If Hell is real how could the Apostle Paul (who was especially

commissioned by God to preach the gospel to the nations) say that he had

declared the entire counsel of God (Acts 20:27), when indeed he never

warned of “Hell” in any of his letters? If Hell is real, wouldn’t Paul,

of all people, warn of it repeatedly?


If Hell is real, the sin/death of Adam has had a far more powerful

effect on the world than the resurrection life of Christ! And yet Paul

declares in Romans 5 that Christ’s victory is far greater than Adam’s

transgression! Listen to Paul’s confidence in the work of Christ! If

Paul believed in eternal hell for the majority of men, how could he

write the following verses?


“.Just as the result of one trespass (Adam’s) was condemnation for all

men , so also the result of one act of righteousness (Christ’s) was

justification that brings life for all men . For just as through the

disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through

the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous. ( Romans

5:18,19).


“Since by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection of the

dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.”

(1 Cor. 15:22)


“For to this end we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in

the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who

believe” (1 Timothy 4;10).


(The above verses are just a few of the many verses where Paul writes of

a pre-eminent Christ that far transcends the traditional Christian view.

This article is full of many more New Testament references by Paul that

display his views of the Christ triumphant, unlimited, all-powerful,

all-conquering, and victorious).


If Hell is real, why is it that the only time Paul even mentioned “Hell”

in any of his epistles, was declare the triumph of Christ over it? (1

Corinthians 15:55). The word “Grave” in the passage is the Greek word

“Hades.”


If Hell is real, why is it not mentioned once in the book of Acts in any

the evangelistic sermons that were recorded by the early Apostles?


If Hell is real why do some of the best Bible scholars and Bible

teachers say it is not in the Greek or Hebrew text? (William Barclay,

John A.T. Robinson, Lightfoot, Westcott, F.W. Farrar, Marvin Vincent,

etc.)


If Hell is real, why does the word itself come from the Teutonic “Hele”

(goddess of the underworld “Hell” of northern Europe ). The description

of this ancient mythological place has very little resemblance anymore

to the modern Christian image of Hell. See any encyclopedia or

dictionary for the origin of the word.


FACT: The apocryphal books of the intertestimental period had a

tremendous impact on the Jews in the time of Christ. It is from these

books, especially the book of Enoch, that many of the Jewish myths and

fables concerning Hell, heaven, demons and angels and many other fables

first became a part of Judaism and from there became a part of

Christianity. The myths and fables of these books came from Pagan

influences (namely Zoroastrianism), during and after the Babylonian

captivity of Israel . In fact, Zoroastrianism looks more like modern

Christianity in many ways than ancient Judiasm does!


If Hell is real, why did Paul warn Timothy repeatedly to stay away from

Jewish myths and fables, the likes of which were influencing many in the

early church? Rather than affirming such doctrines, Paul declares them

to be profane fables. (1 Tim. 1:1; Tit. 1:14)


Hell Contradicts The Work of the Messiah:


Popular myth: Jesus came to save the sinner from his destination of

everlasting Hell. Not exactly true! Hell was never a place that the Jews

were hoping to be saved from, since they didn’t even believe in it! But

they did need to be saved from their sins and consequences of them;

namely death. Jesus came as the Anointed One to fulfill all of God’s

plan for the earth-that through Him might come the salvation,

deliverance of sin, peace, kingdom of God and all that God had promised

through the Old Testament scriptures. There is much we can say here, but

for the sake of brevity we will limit our points to a few key passages.

Please take the time to look up the verses that are referenced.


For the entire article, go to

http://www.tentmaker.org/articles/ifhellisreal.htm

Read more at www.arcticbeacon.com
 

Honest Questions and Answers about Hell

Amplify’d from www.tentmaker.org

Honest Questions and Answers about Hell




By Mercy Aiken and Gary Amirault

The case against Hell: Did you know that there is a solid scriptural case to be made against the idea of Hell? Many non-Christians have rejected the concept of Hell, but it may come as a surprise to learn that there is a growing number of Bible-believing Christians who also reject the notion-not in spite of Scripture but because of it! This short study is meant only to raise some questions and provide brief answers. For further study, please refer to the links at the end of the article.


An open and unbiased study of the Bible, including many key Greek and Hebrew words as well as Church history will reveal some surprising things.


For instance, did you know that....


"Hell" Is Not an Old Testament doctrine:


Popular myth : Hell is an established Biblical doctrine that is in the Bible from start to finish. This is not true! Two thirds of the Bible (the Old Testament) does not mention Hell at all. ("Sheol," the Old Testament word that is sometimes translated as Hell, only means "grave" by definition, and it is where everyone in the Old Testament went when they died--good or evil, Jew or Gentile). Thus the Old Testament does not contain the concept of Hell!


Think about it...


If Hell is real, why didn't God make that warning plain right at the beginning of the Bible? God said the penalty for eating of the tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was death- -not "eternal life" in fire and brimstone.


If Hell is real, why wasn't Cain warned about it, or Sodom and Gomorrah , or any of those who committed the earliest recorded "sins?"


If Hell is real why didn't Moses warn about this fate in the Ten Commandments or the Mosaic Covenant consisting of over 600 laws, ordinances, and warnings? The Mosaic Law simply stated blessings and cursings in this lifetime.


If Hell is real, why are its roots in paganism, rather than the Bible? Many nations surrounding Israel in the Old Testament believed in Hell-like punishment in the afterlife, for they served bloodthirsty and evil "gods," while Israel simply taught the grave (sheol) and a hope of a resurrection. If Hell is real, why was the revelation of it first given to pagan nations, instead of God's covenant people? Did God expect Israel to learn about the afterlife from the Pagan Gentiles? If so, why did He repeatedly warn Israel to not learn of their ways?


If Hell is real, why did God tell the Jews that burning their children alive in the fire to the false god Molech, (in the valley of Gehenna ) was so detestable to Him? God said that such a thing "never even entered His mind" (Jer. 32:35). How could God say such a thing to Israel , if He has plans to burn alive a good majority of His own creation in a spiritual and eternal Gehenna of His own making?


**FACT: The King James Bible erroneously translates the word "Sheol" as Hell a total of 31 times in the Old Testament, thus setting a foundation for that doctrine in the New Testament as well as the majority of Bible translations to follow the KJV. Even so, most new translations have completely eliminated Hell from the Old Testament, as honest and better scholarship has demanded. The Jewish version of the Old Testament (the Tanakh) has no concept of Hell in it. The importance of this fact cannot be over-emphasized. If a doctrine does not appear as seed form in the books of the Law, the Prophets and the Psalms, it cannot fairly be taught as a major biblical doctrine, if indeed it can be taught as biblical at all!



Hell Is Not a New Testament Doctrine:


Popular myth: Jesus spoke of Hell more than He did of Heaven. This is not true! Jesus warned the Jews many times of impending destruction, both nationally and individually. He used several different terms to refer to punishment/destruction, some of which were erroneously translated as the same word, "Hell" by Bible translators. We do not deny that God will indeed judge the whole world, nor do we wish to make light of His judgments. We are challenging the belief that His judgment on sin and unbelief is eternal torment/Hell and never-ending separation from God. Certainly, Jesus spent a lot of his ministry warning people to repent or reap the consequences, (particularly "Gehenna.") But could we be reading more into His warnings than He originally intended?


Think about it.......


If Hell is real, why were most of the warnings pertaining to punishment/Gehenna directed to Israel , particularly the Lord's own disciples as well as the Pharisees? The first great cluster of references to Gehenna, are found in the Sermon on the Mount (Mat 5:22, 29, 30), Jesus' great sermon to His disciples in which He warned that one was in danger of Gehenna for the likes of calling someone a fool. This is a far cry from our modern Evangelical interpretation that says not accepting Jesus as your Savior is what sends someone to Hell. Are we perhaps missing the symbolism that Jesus originally intended?


If Hell is real, aren't we taking verses out of context when we warn non-Jewish sinners who are not part of the Mosaic covenant God made with the nation of Israel about consequences for sin which have nothing to do with them since they are not under that covenant?


Since the concept of Hell doesn't exist in the Old Testament, how could Jesus and his disciples teach that salvation was deliverance from a place that is not even found in their Scriptures? And if He was introducing the subject for the first time, why did He do it so casually, as though His listeners already understood what He was talking about?


If Hell is real, since some English translations use the word Hell for the Greek word "Gehenna," in the New Testament, why didn't this same place (Gehenna) get translated Hell in the many places where it appears in the Hebrew form "ga ben Hinnom" in the Old Testament?


If the Jews did not understand "Gehenna" as a symbol of everlasting torture, but rather as a place of shame, filth, and defilement (where Israel participated in the grossest form of idol worship), why does modern theology ascribe more to the word than the original meaning did? The teaching of Gehenna has evolved in Jewish teachings to include punishment in the afterlife; but even today, Gehenna still does not mean "endless" punishment to the Jews.


If Hell is real how could the Apostle Paul (who was especially commissioned by God to preach the gospel to the nations) say that he had declared the entire counsel of God (Acts 20:27), when indeed he never warned of "Hell" in any of his letters? If Hell is real, wouldn't Paul, of all people, warn of it repeatedly?


If Hell is real, the sin/death of Adam has had a far more powerful effect on the world than the resurrection life of Christ! And yet Paul declares in Romans 5 that Christ's victory is far greater than Adam's transgression! Listen to Paul's confidence in the work of Christ! If Paul believed in eternal hell for the majority of men, how could he write the following verses?


".Just as the result of one trespass (Adam's) was condemnation for all men , so also the result of one act of righteousness (Christ's) was justification that brings life for all men . For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous. ( Romans 5:18,19).


"Since by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive." (1 Cor. 15:22)


"For to this end we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe" (1 Timothy 4;10).


(The above verses are just a few of the many verses where Paul writes of a pre-eminent Christ that far transcends the traditional Christian view. This article is full of many more New Testament references by Paul that display his views of the Christ triumphant, unlimited, all-powerful, all-conquering, and victorious).


If Hell is real, why is it that the only time Paul even mentioned "Hell" in any of his epistles, was declare the triumph of Christ over it? (1 Corinthians 15:55). The word "Grave" in the passage is the Greek word "Hades."


If Hell is real, why is it not mentioned once in the book of Acts in any the evangelistic sermons that were recorded by the early Apostles?


If Hell is real why do some of the best Bible scholars and Bible teachers say it is not in the Greek or Hebrew text? (William Barclay, John A.T. Robinson, Lightfoot, Westcott, F.W. Farrar, Marvin Vincent, etc.)


If Hell is real, why does the word itself come from the Teutonic "Hele" (goddess of the underworld "Hell" of northern Europe ). The description of this ancient mythological place has very little resemblance anymore to the modern Christian image of Hell. See any encyclopedia or dictionary for the origin of the word.


FACT: The apocryphal books of the intertestimental period had a tremendous impact on the Jews in the time of Christ. It is from these books, especially the book of Enoch, that many of the Jewish myths and fables concerning Hell, heaven, demons and angels and many other fables first became a part of Judaism and from there became a part of Christianity. The myths and fables of these books came from Pagan influences (namely Zoroastrianism), during and after the Babylonian captivity of Israel . In fact, Zoroastrianism looks more like modern Christianity in many ways than ancient Judiasm does!


If Hell is real, why did Paul warn Timothy repeatedly to stay away from Jewish myths and fables, the likes of which were influencing many in the early church? Rather than affirming such doctrines, Paul declares them to be profane fables. (1 Tim. 1:1; Tit. 1:14)


Hell Contradicts The Work of the Messiah:


Popular myth: Jesus came to save the sinner from his destination of everlasting Hell. Not exactly true! Hell was never a place that the Jews were hoping to be saved from, since they didn't even believe in it! But they did need to be saved from their sins and consequences of them; namely death. Jesus came as the Anointed One to fulfill all of God's plan for the earth-that through Him might come the salvation, deliverance of sin, peace, kingdom of God and all that God had promised through the Old Testament scriptures. There is much we can say here, but for the sake of brevity we will limit our points to a few key passages. Please take the time to look up the verses that are referenced.


Think about it...


If Hell is real, why does Psalm 22 (one of the most prophetic passages in scripture concerning the Messiah) promise that because of the cross, " All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the LORD , and all the families of the nations will worship before You. For the kingdom is the LORD'S and He rules over the nations. All the prosperous of the earth will eat and worship , all those who go down to the dust will bow before Him, even he who cannot keep his soul alive " (Psalm 22:27-29 NASB).


If Hell is real, did Jesus fail in His mission? He said, "I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world" (John 12:47).


If Hell is real and most find their way to it, was Jesus lying when He said if He was lifted up (crucified) that He would "draw" ("drag" in the original Greek word, "helkyo") all mankind unto Himself? (John 12:32)


If Hell is real and eternal, how can the Scriptures speak of the gathering of all things into Christ? (Eph. 1:10)


If Hell is real and eternal, how can all things be subdued unto Christ? (1 Corinthians 15:28, Philippians 3:21, Hebrews 2:8).


If Hell is real and eternal, how can it be that the scriptures promise that every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord? (Isaiah 45:23, Romans 14:11, Philippians 2:10).


If Hell is real and eternal, how will Jesus ever see the travail of His soul and be satisfied (Isaiah 53:11)? If the traditional understanding is correct, most of those He came to save will never experience His salvation. Do we believe that this would be satisfying to Jesus?


If Hell is real, and God sent Jesus to save people from it, can we really say that the will and pleasure of God has prospered in His hand, since, according to traditional theology, only a few will ever be saved? (Isaiah 53:10, and 55:11).


If Hell is real, and the devil is the one who deceives people into going there, isn't he ultimately the winner in the war for souls? After all, traditional interpretation of the Bible says that more people will end up in Hell than in Heaven. If so, how can we really call Satan the defeated enemy and Christ the victor?


If Hell is real and most of mankind will remain in an eternal deathlike state of torment with no chance to repent or escape, how exactly are we to understand and rejoice in the fact that Jesus destroyed death and him that had the power of death (Satan)? (Hebrews 2:14-15, 1 John 3:8, Hosea 13:14, 1 Corinthians 15:55, 1 Corinthians 15:26 etc.)


If Hell is eternal, how can the increase of Christ's government and of peace have no end? (Isaiah 9:7).


FACT: The term "saved" has evolved in Christianity to mean something different than it did to the original readers and hearers of Scripture. The Greek words, "sozo" and "soteria" embrace the broad meaning of being rescued, delivered, healed and saved from danger. These words were applied in a variety of ways throughout the New Testament. There is much more to the salvation of Christ than most Christians know. Sadly, much of the church is robbed of fullness of their salvation by embracing a limited and futuristic view of what it actually means-- (i.e. "going to Heaven when they die").


Popular Myth: "Eternity" is a theme that is throughout the entire Bible, including eternal punishment. Not exactly true! We are not denying that the New Testament is full of warnings of judgment, and that the words, "everlasting" and "eternal" appear often in most translations. However, a careful study of the words that are translated to mean forever or everlasting, will prove that they have been mistranslated. The question is not whether or not God will punish sin and rebellion, but rather how He does it, and for what purpose and how long the correc5ion lasts.


Think about it..


If Hell is forever, why is the Hebrew word Olam (which has been translated to mean "eternal/forever") used in so many verses where it clearly does not mean "everlasting? A few examples: "Everlasting" is applied to the priesthood of Aaron; to the statutes of Moses; to the mountains and hills; and to the doors of the Jewish temple, to the length of time that reproach and shame should be upon the Jews. The word "forever" is applied to the duration of man's earthly existence; to the time a child was to abide in the temple; to the continuance of Gehazi's leprosy; to the to the duration of a king's life; to the time a servant was to abide with his master; to the duration of the Jewish temple; to the time David was to be king over Israel; to the throne of Solomon; to the stones that were set up at Jordan; and to the time Jonah was in the fish's belly. It should be obvious from the context that olam merely referred to an indefinite period of time--not forever!


Aion and related words ( aionian and aionios ) are the Greek equivalents of olam . Aion, literally means "age," from which we get our English word, "eon." Aion/age/eon, is merely a period of time. "Aionian and Aionios" are words that refer to the ages (plural) or pertaining to the ages. As long as time is being measured, it cannot be referring to eternity, which is a realm beyond the measurement of time. If "Hell" is forever, why is it described by words that pertain to the ages?


If the Greek word Aion and its derivatives mean eternal as some Bible scholars insist, why did contemporary Greek usage of it, at the time the New Testament was written, not carry with it the idea of endless eternity? (Works by Plato, Aristotle, Homer, Hippocrates and many others use these words in a limited, not an eternal sense).


If Hell is forever, how do we explain the fact that aion/olam did not mean eternal/unending to the original writers and hearers of Scripture?


FACT: Some would argue that if aionian and related words do not mean eternal, then God cannot be eternal, for these words also describe Him. To this we say, that just because God is described as the God of the eons, does not mean that He is not the God who also transcends the eons. In the same way, just because He is called the God of Israel , does not also mean that He is not the God of all the other nations. Also, there are other Greek words used to refer to the unending power and life of God. They are, aptharsia/apthartos, which means imperishableness and immortality; amarantinos/amarantos which mean unfading; and akatalytos , which means indestructable. They are usually translated as immortal, or incorruptible. Please refer to the following verses for reference: Hebrews 7:15-16, 1 Peter 1:3-4, 1 Peter 5:4, 1 Timothy 1:17, Romans 1:23, 1 Corinthians 9:25, 1 Corinthians 15:51-54, Romans 2:7, 1 Corinthians 15:42, 2 Timothy 1:10, and 1 Timothy 6:16.


Popular Myth: One's fate is sealed after death. If this is true, how do we deal with the following scriptures that indicate the opposite?


Think about it...


"Like water spilled on the ground, which cannot be recovered, so we must die. But God does not take away life; instead, He devises ways so that a banished person may not remain estranged from him" (2 Samuel 14:14).


"The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: He bringeth down to the grave (sheol), and bringeth up." 1 Samuel 2: 6


"See now that I, even I, am He, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand" (Deuteronomy 32:39).


"I will ransom them from the power of the grave (Sheol/Hell); I will redeem them from death. O Death, I will be your plagues! O Grave (Sheol/Hell), I will be your destruction!" (Hosea 13:11-14).


"For men are not cast off by the Lord forever. Though He brings grief, he will show compassion, so great is His unfailing love. For He does not willingly bring affliction or grief to the children of men. (Lam 3:31-33)


"Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still with him on the way, or he may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny" (Matthew 5:25-26).


If Hell is a place of no escape, why did the early church teach Jesus went to Hell (Hades), preached to them and led captivity captive? (Eph. 4:8,9; Psalm 68:18; 1 Peter 3:18-20)


If Hell lasts forever, why the Psalmist confidently speak again and again about being rescued from it (sheol)? (Psalms 16:10, 30:2-3, Psalm 49:15, 86:13, 116:3-8, 139:8).


If Hell is real, how can Solomon teach that the spirit of man will return to the God Who gave it? (Ecc 12:7).


If the grave settled the matter forever, why did the early Christians offer up prayers for the dead? Why were they baptized for the dead? (1 Corinthians 15:29).


 


"Hell" Was Not a Doctrine of the Early Church:


Popular myth: Universalism was recently introduced to Christianity in the 1800's as the church became more liberal and modern and began to abandon their true biblical foundation. This is not true! A belief in the restitution of all things was a standard view in the early church, held by the majority of early Christians. It has also been held by a minority throughout all of church history even during the Dark Ages.


Think about it..


If Hell was real, why did the first comparatively complete systematic statement of Christian doctrine ever given to the world by Clement of Alexandria, A.D. 180, contain the tenet of universal salvation?


If Hell was real, why did the first complete presentation of Christianity (Origen, 220 A.D.) contain the doctrine of universal salvation?


If Hell was real, why do neither the Apostles Creed, nor the Nicean Creed, two foundational "doctrinal statements" for the early church, contain the concept of Hell?


If Hell was real, why did Church leaders as late as the fourth century AD acknowledge that the majority of Christians believed in the salvation of all mankind?


If Hell was real why did the early church appoint an avowed universalist as the President of the second council of the church of Constantinope in the fourth century? (Gregory Nazianzen, 325-381).


If Hell was real why did not a single Church council for the first five hundred years condemn Universalism as heresy considering the fact that they made many declarations of heresy on other teachings?


If Hell was real why didn't Epiphanius (c. 315-403) the "hammer of heretics" who listed 80 heresies of his time not list universalism among those heresies?


If Hell was real, since most historians would acknowledge today that Origen was perhaps the most outstanding example of universalism in the church, when Methodius, Eusibius, Pamphilus, Marcellus, Eustathius, and Jerome made their lists of Origen's heresies, why wasn't universalism among them?


If Hell was real and found in the original Greek manuscripts of the Bible, why is it that it was primarily those church leaders who either couldn't read Greek (For example, Minucius Felix), or hated Greek as in the case of Augustine, that the doctrine of Hell was advocated? Those early church leaders familiar with the Greek and Hebrew (the original languages of the Bible) saw universal salvation in those texts. Those who advocated Hell got it from the Latin, not from the original Greek and Hebrew. Who would more likely be correct--those who could read the original languages of the Bible or those who read a Latin translation made by one man (Jerome)?


If Hell was real then why did four out of six theological schools from 170 AD to 430 AD teach universal salvation while the only one that taught Hell was in Carthage, Africa, again were Latin was the teaching language, not Greek?


If Hell was real and a serious heresy, why was it not until the sixth century when Justinian, a half-pagan emperor, tried to make universalism a heresy? Interestingly, most historians will acknowledge that Justinian's reign was among the most cruel and ruthless.


*The historical facts documented in the above section can all be verified through the books, "Universalism, the Prevailing Doctrine of the Early Church for the First 500 Years" by J.W. Hanson and "The History of Opinions on the Scriptural Doctrine of Retribution" by Edward Beecher.


Hell does not reflect the heart of God:


Popular myth: The justice of God demands a place like Hell in which the wicked shall be eternally punished for their sins. Not true! The justice of God demanded a perfect sacrifice for sin, and that man was Christ Jesus. The justice of God will certainly come to every person, and God may deal severely with our sins as He subdues and gathers all things to Christ, but to punish people endlessly for crimes committed in a short human lifespan defies all logic and justice. How is it just to have unending punishment for offenses that have limits?


Think about it....


If Hell is real and all things were made for God's pleasure (Rev. 4:11), is it conceivable that God would derive pleasure from seeing those He created endlessly tortured? God says He takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ez. 33:11).


If Hell is a real place of endless torment, and God didn't want anyone to end up there, why didn't God just kill Adam and Eve and end the long terrible chain of misery that passed to their offspring before it began? After all, the Scriptures say that all died because of Adam. (Rom. 5:18)


If Hell is real, if God loves His enemies now, will he not always love them? Is God a changeable being? (James 1:17)


If Hell is real, if you had sufficient power would you not deliver all men from sin? If God would save all men, but cannot , is He infinite in power?


If Hell is real, and God can save all men, but will not , is He infinite in goodness and mercy?


If Hell is real, since God will have all men be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth (1 Tim. 2:3 KJV), does that mean God's power is not strong enough to have His will fulfilled?


If Hell is real and Jesus teaches us to forgive seventy times seven and yet He Himself will never offer forgiveness to anyone after they die, does that not make Him a hypocrite?


If Hell is real and God's wrath abides upon billions of human beings forever, doesn't that violate the Scripture which says His anger will come to an end? (Isaiah 57:16-18)


If Hell is real and God only loves those who love Him, what better is He than the sinner? (Luke 6:32-33)


If Hell is real, since some people receive many chances to "get saved," some receive only a few chances and billions have never even received one chance, does that make God a respecter of persons? (Acts 10:34, James 3:17). After all, billions of people have been born and died on this earth without a chance to ever hear the name of Jesus, the "only name under heaven by which men may be saved."


If there is a Hell and all who have sinned are destined to go there (which is everyone) unless they figure out how to avoid it, does that not consign all aborted babies and non-Christian children to Hell? (While some denominations teach a so-called "age of accountability," it is not found anywhere in the Bible. It is just some people's way of trying to make God more humane than the eternal torment teaching makes Him out to be).


If Hell is real, does that mean that motherly love is more powerful and enduring than God's love? Do you know of normal parents who would endlessly torment most of their kids? Why do we believe our heavenly Father, Who is millions of times more loving than all of us combined, could do such an evil, wicked thing?


If Hell is real, why does the human spirit writhe under the horror of wars and prison camps, torture chambers and dictators? How can we judge these things as wrong, if Hell is real? After all, Hell far eclipses these earthly torments which came from the most sinful and beastly part of humanity. We say God is grieved by man's violence and disregard for life, and yet believe that He Himself enforces the same principles for all eternity!


If Hell is real, how would endless misery benefit the Almighty, as the inflictor? How would endless misery benefit the saints, as spectators? How would endless misery benefit the sinner, as the sufferer?


If Hell is real, how does the threat of endlessly torturing us convince us that God loves us and that we should love Him with all our heart, soul, mind and strength?


FACT: While the church has gotten used to thinking of God as Someone who was forced to design a grandiose punishment called Hell, and against His own will sends the majority of His creation there, this concept of a God "who did the best He could" is totally against the Scriptural view of a God who is absolutely sovereign, powerful, all-wise and all-victorious. He never had to come up with a plan B or C, for Jesus is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. It is time to give Him the glory He deserves for our God is truly awesome and wonderful far beyond the limited, and man-centered views of Him!


Come Up Higher!


Beloved, what is the "lens" through which you are interpreting the Bible? Traditional doctrines teach us to interpret the "victorious" scriptures in the light of the "judgment" scriptures. But what if God wants us to see it the other way around? What if we are to interpret the "judgment" scriptures in the light of the "victorious" scriptures? Is not Christ's victory the greatest revelation in the Bible? Standing on this highest peak-that is, the finished work of the cross, causes us to see a much larger and far more beautiful panoramic view of God's plan throughout the ages. We do not throw out one set of Scriptures in favor of another. Rather, we seek to harmonize them.For man shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.


In the time of Christ, most of Israel completely missed the Word of God when He was in their midst. They were too busy with their nose in the book, to perceive the Word Himself as He came and walked among them! Many Jews were afraid to believe in Jesus, since the majority of their leaders (Scribes, Pharisees, Saducees, Priests etc) who knew the scriptures better than they did, were convinced that He was not the Messiah. In the early days of the church, faith in Jesus Christ was heresy and to admit faith in Him was basically asking for scorn and rejection. Modern Christians point the finger at Israel of old, not realizing that we are following in their footsteps today. Most of us play it safe, siding with the denomination or movement that we happen to be a part of. While there is wisdom in honoring our spiritual fathers, we can never allow them to take the place of the Holy Spirit teaching us in our own lives.


The facts presented in this article should at least cause every reader who is truly hungry to know God, to search the scripture to see if these things be so. If what we are presenting here is false, it needs to be disproved. And if it is true, it cannot be ignored.


It is time to stop skipping the parts of the Bible that do not fit in with our theology. And if, like the religious leaders of Jesus' day, our theology is not big enough to hold the entire counsel of Scripture, perhaps it is time to expand--lest we once again miss God!


And so we ask you again, beloved Christian, to ask yourself.


If the traditional teaching of Hell is real..


How can mercy triumph over judgment? (James 2:13)


How can it be true that, "where sin abounded grace did much more abound?" (Rom. 5:20)


When will all flesh come to God? (Psalm 65:2-4)


When will the poor of the earth be avenged and comforted by God? (Psalm 113:7, Psalm 140:12, Proverbs 14:31, Proverbs 19:17, Proverbs 31:9, Isaiah 11:4, Isaiah 61:1, Jeremiah 22:16 etc.) (Bear in mind that most of the poor of the earth throughout history have not had a chance to accept Jesus as their savior).


When shall it come to pass that: "On this mountain the LORD Almighty will prepare a feast of rich food for all peoples, a banquet of aged wine- the best of meats and the finest of wines. On this mountain he will destroy the shroud that enfolds all peoples, the sheet that covers all nations; he will swallow up death forever. The Sovereign LORD will wipe away the tears from all faces; he will remove the disgrace of his people from all the earth. The LORD has spoken" (Isaiah 26:6-8).


When and how will "all nations" praise Him, come to Him, serve Him, be blessed in Him and bow to Him? (Psalm 45:17, Ps. 86:9, Isaiah 62:11, Daniel 7:14 Ps 66:1, Ps 72:11, Ps 102:15, Jer. 3:17, Ps 72:17, Isa. 2:2, Isa. 11:10, Isa. 52:10, Rev. 5:13 etc.)


How can the world be reconciled to God? (2 Corinthians 5:19, Romans 11;5, Romans 5:10).


Why would Paul the apostle say the goal of God's creative plan was to ultimately be "all in all?" (1 Cor. 15:28)


How can it be true that God, Who works all things according to the counsel of His will, shall gather together all things in Christ, in the fullness of the times? (Ephesians 1:9-11)


How can Paul insist that "For of Him and through Him and to Him are all things" (Romans 11:36).


How can the most often-repeated Biblical description of God be true? "His mercy endures forever" (literally, "His mercy/lovingkindness endures for the ages"). Certainly, as long as there are ages, and people in need of mercy, God's mercy will endure.


How and when can there ever be a "restitution of all things?" (Acts 3:21)


A Final Test


We have tested the doctrine of Hell against many different Biblical topics and concepts and found it wanting. When scrutinized in the light of the entire counsel of Scripture, the doctrine of Hell is found to be full of holes. Now, test this doctrine against your own heart and see whether it can stand. Please take some time and prayerfully ask yourself these questions:


If there is a Hell and according to most denominations of Christianity the majority of mankind will go there, could you really enjoy heaven knowing your mother or father or children or best friend are suffering everlasting tortures the likes of which would make the Holocaust seem like a picnic?


If Hell is real, will you judge your mother, son, or other non-believers to Hell ? "Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world"? And if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? How much more things that pertain to this life?" 1 Corinthians 6:2-3


If Hell is real and a place of terrible, unending pain, could you even send a dog to such a place?


If Hell is real and universalism is a heresy, why is it that those who believe God loves all and will save all find it easier to love all people than those who believe most people are going to Hell? (Think this through very carefully.)


If Hell is real, can you honestly rejoice in the victory, love, and wisdom of God, knowing that somewhere in His beautiful creation there will always be a black and stinking hell-hole crammed full of tortured souls who have no chance for relief or forgiveness--or even death? Even if there was only one person left in such a state, how could all of Heaven rejoice for all eternity knowing that there was still one soul who had not been touched by the victory of Christ and was suffering alone?


Is it good to desire all men to be saved? "This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior Who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." (1 Tim.2:3,4).


. Do you ardently desire the salvation of all men?

. Is it true that God "openeth His hand and satisfieth the desire of every living thing?" -- (Ps. 145:16)

. Do you fervently pray for the salvation of all men? (1 Tim. 2:1)

. Do you pray in faith, nothing doubting? (James 1:6)

. Are you aware, "that whatsoever is not of faith is sin?" -- (Rom 14:23)

. Would God require us to pray for all men, and to pray in faith, unless He intends all men should be saved?

. If you believe endless misery to be the truth of God, why should you desire and pray that it may prove false?



We hope that this information has raised enough questions for you to pursue further study on this subject. For more information on the history of the doctrine of Hell, the Lake of Fire , Studies on Biblical words that are often translated as eternal, everlasting, etc. and many other teachings pertaining to this subject, please visit: www.tentmaker.org/ScholarsCorner.html


Some of these questions were taken from a much larger list compiled in an article entitled Is Salvation a Deliverance From Hell or Eternal Death? " by Gary Amirault .


The painting on the front of this booklet is a scene from "The Damned" by Michelangelo. His paintings of Hell and the damned, like much Christian art of the time, was influenced more by Greek mythology of the underworld, than by the Bible.


Who are we? Tentmaker Ministries and Publications is a Christian ministry committed to sharing as best to our ability our understanding of God's plan for the ages to reconcile all things to Himself through Jesus Christ. (This view is also known as Ultimate reconciliation or Christian universalism, which is a very different thing than Unitarian Universalism). We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of the world, the only way to the Father, the only begotten Son of God, and that there is no other way to everlasting, "aionian" life but through Him. We believe He is king of the universe, and owner of all Creation, and that His purpose is to bring all things under His government and reconciled with Himself.


".And for this we labor and strive, that we have put our hope in the living God, Who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe" (1 Timothy 4:10 ).

Read more at www.tentmaker.org
 

Alan Simpson Calls Seniors 'The Greediest Generation'

Amplify’d from www.hapblog.com


Alan Simpson Calls Seniors 'The Greediest Generation'

Simpson says he's taking flak for his proposals to reduce the debt
SIMPSON: "People I know say 'you son of a b*tch, how could you do this.' Simpson also call Rush Limbaugh "Rush babe" once again and Rachel Maddow "Rachel Minnow." Simpson says they're "entertainers"
CHEYENNE--During Al Simpson's nearly 50 years in government, he hasn't been afraid to take on critics and naysayers of his work in the U.S. Senate or on a variety of high-profile commissions and committees.

But as the co-chair of President Obama's debt commission, the Wyoming Republican said he's been taking an unprecedented amount of flak for the commission's draft proposals to help erase the nation's $13.8 trillion debt.

"I've never had any nastier mail or [been in a] more difficult position in my life," said the 79-year-old Simpson. "Just vicious. People I've known, relatives [saying], "'You son of a bitch. How could you do this?'"

Simpson said that while every interest group that testified before his committee agreed that the mounting federal debt is a national tragedy, they would then talk about why government funding to their area of interest shouldn't be touched.

"We had the greatest generation -- I think this is the greediest generation," he said.

All this hubbub isn't a surprise to Simpson, given how politically polarized the country is these days.

"You don't want to listen to the right and the left -- the extremes," he said. "You don't want to listen to Keith Olbermann and Rush Babe [Limbaugh] and Rachel Minnow [sic] or whatever that is, and Glenn Beck. They're entertainers. They couldn't govern their way out of a paper sack -- from the right or the left. But they get paid a lot of money from you and advertisers -- thirty, fifty million a year -- to work you over and get you juiced up with emotion, fear, guilt, and racism. Emotion, fear, guilt, and racism.

"Time to go for facts. Everybody's entitled to their own opinion, but nobody's entitled to their own facts,"
Read more at www.hapblog.com