ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Take a picture, go to jail - A Celebration of Street Photography, as Anti-Terror Backlash Fades

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

A Celebration of Street Photography, as Anti-Terror Backlash Fades

Take a picture, go to jail.

It may seem absurd, but since 2005 that scenario or something like it was playing out with surprising regularity on public streets in Britain, where draconian anti-terror legislation declared photographers “suspicious” merely for carrying camera equipment.

At its height, a tweed-wearing photographer was branded a terrorist by a London Tube worker, police deleted a young Austrian tourist’s photos “to prevent terrorism,” an Italian student was arrested for filming in London’s financial district, and an architectural historian was detained for photographing a building designed by his grandfather.

Now, the tide is turning. The suspicious-photo law was suspended this summer, and September saw the release of Street Photography Now, an anthology of famous and not-so-famous works by street photographers from across the globe, aimed at highlighting the substantial artistic merits of the form.

Here’s gallery of selected images from the book:


<< Previous
|
Next >>
Oxford Street, London, 2004
Oxford Street, London, 2004
Salaryman Project 2008/2009
Night walk, China, 2007. Photo: Polly Braden
Mexico City. 2003. Cotton candy being spun at the Zocalo. Photo: Alex Webb
Charity, Bournemouth. 2008. Photo: Paul Russell
Fighting Ladies, Bristol. 2007. Photo: Paul Russell
Mexico City, 2007. Photo: Mark Powell
Notting Hill, tube train, London (2007) Photo: Nils Jorgensen
Photo: Nick Turpin www.nickturpin.com
Street Photography Now, book cover

Photographer: Matt Stuart

Title: "Oxford Street, London"

Year: 2004


<< Previous
|
Next >>

The Prevention of Terrorism Act passed into British law in 2000. Section 44 established the authority of police officers to stop and search members of the public. In 2005, the law was revised to declare carrying photography equipment suspicious behavior.

The tension reached a tipping point in 2008, when London’s Metropolitan police launched a poster campaign singling out the act of photography as suspicious — a tactic since repeated by the TSA in the United States. The photo community rallied, organizing campaigns such as I’m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist, and educating one another on their rights through bodies such as the National Union of Journalists’ London Photographers Branch. Photographers also used flash-mob tactics in acts of civil disobedience in Trafalgar Square and at Scotland Yard, London police headquarters.

Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner John Yates issued a reminder in December 2009 that no laws prevent people from photographing buildings. By January 2010, the stop-and-search powers granted under Section 44 were ruled illegal by the European Court of Human Rights. Section 44 was finally suspended this summer. British lawmakers are now rewriting it.

A photographer’s experience on the streets of Britain is better now than it was one or two years ago, but issues remain. The website I Am a Photographer, Not a Terrorist reported following the suspension of Section 44:

Unfortunately there are still a swathe of laws that police can and will still use to harass photographers, most notably Section 43, which is similar to Section 44 but requires an officer to suspect that you are a terrorist, and Section 76 which makes it illegal to ‘elicit information about a police officer’ which includes photographing them.

“For a while in the U.K. we started to get into a debate about ’security’ which took attention away from the really good work that was being produced by street photographers,” says Street Photography Now co-author Steve McLaren. ”Now that the book is out there I’m hopeful that the conversation will resort back to the images themselves and why they might be interesting records of our time.”

Along with the book, McLaren has launched a year-long weekly-assignment Street Photography Flickr project, where aspiring street photographers can contribute their work.

Street Photography Now, by Sophie Howarth and Stephen McLaren, published by Thames & Hudson, $45.

Wired.com also recommends this short Street Photography Now slide show of images and quotes by contributing photographers.

View the Street Photography Now author’s picks.Read more at www.wired.com
 

Texas Senator Sponsors Bill to Bring Ten Commandments to Schools

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

Texas Senator Sponsors Bill to Bring Ten Commandments to Schools

By Stephanie Samuel|Christian Post Reporter

A Texas Republican recently sponsored a bill to ensure that state teachers can display the Ten Commandments in the classroom.

State Rep. Dan Flynn filed a bill stating the school board trustees may not prevent teachers from prominently posting copies of the commandments in their classrooms, which pays homage to America’s Judeo-Christian roots.

"For too long, we've forsaken what our Judeo-Christian heritage has been. Our rights do come from God, not from government," Flynn told the Star-Telegram.

Flynn’s proposal openly challenges previous legal disputes over the public display of religious symbols and sacred text on public property.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that religious symbols and wording can be displayed publically as long as it can be proved that the motivation for doing so is secular. The ruling, a green light to some, has been used to take down displays in some states.

In Kentucky, a federal court upheld a permanent injunction against three Ten Commandment exhibits in June. District Court Judge Jennifer Coffman ruled that the displays were likely unconstitutional as the displays’ history showed that the defendants’ purposes were religious, not secular, and because the displays’ effect was to endorse religion.

But Mathew Staver, founder of the Liberty Counsel, represented the home counties of the exhibits told The Christian Post, “The Ten Commandments are part of the fabric of our country and helped shape our laws. They are as much at home in a display about the foundations of law as stars and stripes are in the American flag.”

Flynn agrees that the Ten Commandments are a display of patriotism as much as it is a display of religion. He also believes it is a sign of morality. "And anything that helps build the morals of our young people would be helpful," he stated.

In any case, legal precedent may be on his side. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court voted 5 -4 to uphold the commandments monument at the Texas capitol building.

Swing vote Justice Stephen Breyer said of Decalogue, “The circumstances surrounding the monument's placement on the capitol grounds and its physical setting provide a strong, but not conclusive, indication that the commandments' text as used on this monument conveys a predominantly secular message."

Flynn also has a majority GOP state House on his side. The Nov. 2 elections ousted two dozen House Democrats. Flynn says his bill well received so far. It is unclear when the bill will be voted on.

Read more at www.christianpost.com
 

Does This Mexican Compound House Tons of U.S. Spies?

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Does This Mexican Compound House Tons of U.S. Spies?

Located just down the street from the U.S. embassy in Mexico City, this unassuming compound might house a smorgasbord of U.S. government agencies, devoted to spying on drug cartels, crime syndicates the Mexican security services and anyone else its inhabitants feel like. But Pentagon says the truth is much more boring.

In a recent story for Mexico’s Proceso, Jorge Carrasco A. and J. Jesús Esquivel introduced the world to the Office of Bi-National Intelligence, supposedly a joint U.S.-Mexico spy apparatus that isn’t so Bi in practice.

Located at 265 Paseo de la Reforma, the “super spy center” is home to (deep breath) the CIA; the FBI; the Department of Homeland Security; the Treasury; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; the National Reconnaissance Office, the NSA; the Defense Intelligence Agency; and the Drug Enforcement Agency. Not evidently included: Mexican agencies.

That might be because Mexican Presidents Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderon authorized and stood up the office “without taking into account any objections from the Mexican military,” according to the Proceso piece, and allowed it to “spy on Mexican government agencies, including the Secretariat of National Defense, Navy, and the diplomatic missions in Mexico.”

The U.S. government says it’s doing nothing of the sort. Representatives from the Pentagon and the CIA say there is no Office of Bi-National Intelligence.

A Pentagon spokesman, Lieutenant Colonel Robert Ditchey, says the compound is actually called the Bilateral Implementation Office for the Merida Initiative, a two-year old multimillion-dollar program providing U.S. aid to train Latin American law enforcement entities. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced its establishment in March 2009 during a Mexico City presser, and it opened its doors this past August 31.

“We have space within the office to use when we visit and attend coordination meetings,” Ditchey says, “however, we do not have personnel assigned there at this time.”

We’re told by a different government agency — cough — there aren’t any spies at the compound. Um, OK. But there appears to be information being exchanged at the facility. When announcing it, Clinton pledged that the Merida Initiative would “use every tool at our current disposal through administrative actions to track illegal guns, to arrest and punish those who are trafficking in illegal guns, to share more information with the Mexican Government so that they can also track and seize these guns.”

Since the establishment of Merida, the United States has become involved in Latin American efforts to stop the flow of drugs and guns to the tune of $1.3 billion. Roberta Jacobson, a senior State Department official for Latin American affairs, bragged in April about seizing “record amounts of drugs” from the cartels and “strengthening institutions, working with the Mexican government on the expansion of their national police.”

The United States has also provided Mexico with five Bell 412 Enhanced Performance helicopters for tracking and harassing the drug dealers — which has alarmed some in Mexico as a measure to even further militarize the increasingly violent struggle with the cartels.

And that’s what really concerns the Proceso writers. As the U.S. military increases its training efforts in Mexico, they write, “the Pentagon has brought counter-insurgency and counter-terrorism expertise from Iraq and Afghanistan to their offices in central Mexico.” Indeed, Robert Killebrew, a retired Army colonel now at the Center for a New American Security, argues that the best way to understand the rise in cartel violence across the Americas is through the prism of insurgency.

But Defense Secretary Robert Gates has been careful to avoid such characterizations. “In terms of helping Mexico, we’re prepared to help the Mexicans insofar as they want our help. They are a sovereign state,” he said in Bolivia yesterday. I would say that our military relationship is probably better now than it has been ever. But there are still obvious sensitivities in Mexico and we have to be attentive to those.”

Still, should the United States ratchet up its aid to Mexico — or move firmly into spycraft down there — 265 Paseo de la Reforma is likely to be where it’s coordinated.

Image: GoogleMaps

See Also:

Read more at www.wired.com
 

Making Disposable Dynamic Displays With Electronic Ink on Real Paper

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Making Disposable Dynamic Displays With Electronic Ink on Real Paper

Engineers at the University of Cincinnati have shown that under the right conditions, ordinary paper can be as dynamic as any screen.

“Nothing looks better than paper for reading,” says research leader Andrew Steckl. “We hope to have something that would actually look like paper but behave like a computer monitor in terms of its ability to store information. We would have something that is very cheap, very fast, full-color and at the end of the day or the end of the week, you could pitch it into the trash.”

Steckl’s e-paper uses electrowetting — moving colored pigments from pixel to pixel with electronic charges — on a paper substrate. Electrowetting offers color, fast response times and video capability that current E Ink electrophoretic screens can’t match, but with similarly low power consumption.

Companies like Liquavista and Plastic Logic have prototype color e-readers that use this technology, but apply the electrowetting chemicals to a sheet of glass. The Cincinati team says its electrowetted paper offers the same performance as glass, but with greater flexibility and at a lower cost.

Steckl and grad student Duk Young Kim of U of C’s Nanoelectronics Laboratory presented their findings in the October issue of the American Chemical Society’s ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces journal. It was then reviewed in the November issue of Nature Photonics. The research was part of Kim’s doctoral dissertation.

“One of the main goals of e-paper is to replicate the look and feel of actual ink on paper,” write Steckl and Kim in the ACS article. “We have, therefore, investigated the use of paper as the perfect substrate for EW devices to accomplish e-paper on paper.”

“In general, this is an elegant method for reducing device complexity and cost, resulting in one-time-use devices that can be totally disposed after use,” the researchers note.

The ACS paper on electrowetting illustrates technical details of the process.

It’s still not easy, and industrializing the process will likely take some time. For maximum performance, the process involves a specific grade of paper with a particular surface coating, roughness, thickness and water uptake and a carefully controlled contact angle at which the electrowetted material is applied to the paper support. Electrowetted glass e-readers may appear sometime next year, but you’re unlikely to see disposable paper screens in newspapers or posters for at least three to five years.

Meanwhile, the Nanoelectronics team will continue experimenting with electrowetting on various flexible surfaces, with different fluids and electronic components, trying to maximize performance.

There’s a historical irony here. In the 19th century, “wet plate” photography involved applying a silver nitrate collodion solution to a glass plate. Eventually, George Eastman was able to take a dry collodion emulsion and apply it to ordinary paper, creating the first camera that ordinary people could use. After Eastman substituted celluloid film, which was stronger but just as flexible as paper, the rest was history.

UC Breakthrough May Lead to Disposable E-Readers [University of Cincinatti Press Release]

Image (top): Electrowetted E-Paper Display Mockup from Liquavista.

See Also:

Read more at www.wired.com
 

INQUISITION NEWS: William Cooper Behold a Pale Horse and Mystery Babylon Series


William Cooper: Amazing Lecture on the Mysteries, Priests Ruling Governments

William Cooper - Behold a Pale Horse and Mystery Babylon Series http://inquisitionnews.blogspot.com/p/william-cooper_29.html

Amplify’d from www.vaticanassassins.org

William Cooper: Amazing Lecture on the Mysteries, Priests Ruling Governments

William Cooper with Daughter, 1990s

William Cooper is your Editor’s favorite among all personalities within the “Conspiracy Theory Movement.” He  was always direct, never leaving the listener wondering what he “really meant.”  He exposed Alex Jones, David Icke and Jordan Maxwell for the deceivers they were and are today.

Further, he encourages the student to read the Bible and always upholds the Lord Jesus Christ. He also denounced the damnable Jesuit Order, publishing its bloody Extreme Oath of the Fourth Vow in his masterpiece, Behold A Pale Horse (1991).  Since he was the greatest threat to the Company’s quest of destroying historical White Anglo-Saxon Protestant America and accompanying Limited Protestant Constitution supplemented with the “heretic and liberal” Baptist-Calvinist Bill of Rights, he was assassinated in 2001.

In the video above, Bill Cooper begins to elaborate on the rule of the priesthood from about 6 minutes onward.

Enjoy!

Read more at www.vaticanassassins.org
 

US Catholic Bishops Approve Baptism Accord with Churches

Amplify’d from www.ktfministry.org

US Catholic Bishops Approve Baptism Accord with Churches · November 23, 2010

By: Denford Ntini

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops approved an agreement recognizing as valid the baptism of four Reformed Christian churches, during its fall general assembly in Baltimore.

The “Common Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Baptism,” has been the result of six years of study and discussion between the representatives of the U.S. Catholic bishops and the Presbyterian Church-USA, the Reformed Church in America, the Christian Reformed Church, and the United Church of Christ.

Noting that the approval was a “milesotne in the ecumenical journey,” Archbishop Wilton Gregory, chairman of the U.S.C.C.B. Committee for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, said, “Together with our Reformed brothers and sisters…we Catholic bishops can once again affirm baptism as the basis of the real, even if incomplete, unity we share in Christ.”

The four Reformed communities must approve the common agreement, which will then “allow Catholic ministers to presume that baptisms performed in these communities are ‘true baptism’ as understood in Catholic doctrine and law.”

All four so-called Reformed churches practice the unbiblical form of baptism known as sprinkling (mostly of infants). Baptism by sprinkling is the all-important ritual that brings a person into the Catholic Church. A common agreement, means then that those who are baptized by these “Reformed communities” are actually accepted as Roman Catholics, whether they individually want to be or not. For the Reformed churches to make such a grand concession clearly overthrows what little protestantism they may still have.

The Holy See speaks “great words against the Most High” and “magnifies himself,” instead of humbling herself and conforming to the clear testimony of Scripture. Her forms of baptism, the mass and other rituals and teachings are in conflict with Holy Scripture.

Biblical baptism is a public declaration of a personal conscious decision to follow Christ and live according to the doctrines of the Bible, not teachings based on a tradition or consensus with other churches. It is not merely a ritual, but a public testimony of a change of heart and life.

Catholics and Reformed Christians “have moved one step closer to that fullness of communion…” said Archbishop Gregory, “on that day when together we can celebrate in oneness of faith and ministry at the one holy table of the Eucharist.”

The popes have made the ecumenical movement a top priority in their quest to get all the world to worship according to their rules or principles (see Revelation 13:8). The ultimate goal of the ecumenical movement is to bring the churches into full, visible, sacramental unity around the Roman Catholich eucharist.

The fast-paced ecumenical movement is rapidly bringing the world to the place where the Holy See will “sit a queen” (Revelation 18:7). With such concessions as these churches have made to the Holy See, it will not be long.

To find unity with Rome, the protestant churches are making major concessions. This will eventually lead to persecution of those who don’t agree with the ecumenical unity promoted by Rome.

“When the leading churches of the United States, uniting upon such points of doctrine as are held by them in common, shall influence the State to enforce their decrees and to sustain their institutions, then Protestant America will have formed an image of the Roman hierarchy, and the infliction of civil penalties upon dissenters will inevitably result.” Great Controversy, p. 445

The undiluted preaching from God’s Word and an authoritative stand on truth are declining. The gospel is now so broad that it accepts all believes, even contradictory ones. The growing emphasis on inclusion and tolerance means that churches must redefine the principles of faith. Ecumenism has come to mean reducing all elements of faith to the lowest common denominator. God’s Word is neglected, experience is valued above truth, a false and selfish “faith” is promoted, and sound doctrine and correction are despised as “divisive” and “unloving.”

“Romanism is now regarded by Protestants with far greater favor than in former years. In those countries where Catholicism is not in the ascendancy, and the papists are taking a conciliatory course in order to gain influence, there is an increasing indifference concerning the doctrines that separate the reformed churches from the papal hierarchy; the opinion is gaining ground that, after all, we do not differ so widely upon vital points as has been supposed, and that a little concession on our part will bring us into a better understanding with Rome. The time was when Protestants placed a high value upon the liberty of conscience which had been so dearly purchased. They taught their children to abhor popery and held that to seek harmony with Rome would be disloyalty to God. But how widely different are the sentiments now expressed!” Great Controversy, p. 563.

http://www.zenit.org/article-30992?l=english

Catholic Culture Article

The Eucharist

Read more at www.ktfministry.org
 

The Plight of Sudanese Christians

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

The Plight of Sudanese Christians

By Chuck Colson|Christian Post Guest Columnist
colson

Eventually, with the help of Christian groups, Bok emigrated to the United States, where he has devoted himself to telling his story and the plight of other Sudanese Christians. Now he is telling an updated version of the tale, one whose ending is yet to be written.

The story concerns a referendum scheduled for January 9, 2011. On that day, the people of southern Sudan will vote on whether to remain a part of Sudan. Even if the run-up of the election had gone smoothly, which it hasn’t, there would still be ample reason to fear what happens after the vote.

One government official has hinted that the government “may not recognize the results” of the referendum. Its stated reason is that the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement hasn’t fulfilled its obligations under the 2005 agreement that ended a 22-year civil war.

That civil war killed at least 2 million people in the south and caused another 4 million to flee their homes. It followed an attempt to impose Shari’a law on Sudan’s Christians and animists. Those who weren’t killed or turned into refuges were often, like Bok, enslaved.

Given this eliminationist history, southerners are expected to vote for independence, and the Sudanese government is expected to balk at letting them go. Not because it’s had a change of heart about its Christian population, but because that population is living atop Sudan’s oil reserves.

That’s the real reason Khartoum won’t recognize the results: If the south goes, it will take Sudan’s economy with it.

The Sudanese government has already proven, both in the south and more recently in Darfur that it is willing to repeatedly commit crimes against humanity to get what it wants. Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, has already been charged with genocide and crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court.

That’s why Bok is crisscrossing this country warning audiences about the likelihood that catastrophic violence will follow the January 9th referendum. He’s not alone: Secretary of State Clinton has called Sudan a “ticking time bomb.”

More ominously, Dennis Blair, the National Director of Intelligence, told Congress that southern Sudan was the most likely candidate for “a new mass killing or genocide.”

Despite the rhetoric, Bok says that he and his countrymen are worried, and it's right that they are. Because the only way the U.S. will protect Bok's people is if the American people, especially Christians, make it clear that standing by and doing nothing is unacceptable.

That’s why I need you to become informed on this issue-we’ll link you to a few articles at BreakPoint.org; just click on today’s BreakPoint commentary.

You and I have an obligation--after all, for two decades, we've been fighting against the persecution of Christians Southern Sudan. And we were successful under the Bush Administration in getting a peace agreement in 2005. So, I want you to be prepared now to tell your representatives and the Administration they must do the right thing.

Sudanese Christians like Francis Bok are determined not to be enslaved again. The question is: Are we willing to help them safeguard their freedom?

Read more at www.christianpost.com
 

The Rapture: Fact or Fiction ?


Police searching for man who drove past boys, acted strangely

Amplify’d from www.ydr.com

Police searching for man who drove past boys, acted strangely

A man is acting strangely around young boys in West Manheim Township, and police are asking for the public's help in identifying him.

West Manheim Township Police are investigating what they call "suspicious circumstances" involving a man driving past boys in the township, including several incidents at a school-bus stop.

Police said that about 7:50 a.m. Monday, a man in a white or silver SUV, possibly a Chevrolet Tahoe, slowly drove by an 11-year-old boy waiting for his school bus. The same thing happened at the same time on Nov. 15 and 18, too, police said.

The bus stop is at the intersection Fuhrman Mill and Frogtown roads, police said.

Police said that during the first two incidents the man drove by the boy several times,








then parked and stared at him until he got on the bus.

During the third incident, the driver stopped on the road and got out of his vehicle, causing the boy to run to a nearby home, police said. When he returned with an adult, the SUV was gone.

Exaggerated smile: Then at about 6:15 p.m. Monday, a man in a similar SUV drove by a group of young boys at least 10 times in the 1300 block of Wanda Drive, staring at them with an exaggerated smile, police said. The vehicle took off when an adult started to approach it, police said.

The driver is described as a white man in his 50s, balding with some gray hair on the side, possibly with a mustache and glasses, police said.

In two of the four incidents, a second person -- of unknown







gender, but apparently in his or her 20s -- was in the front passenger seat of the SUV, police said.

Anyone with information about these incidents is asked to call West Manheim Township Police at 632-7059. Police are asking people to call 911 immediately if they observe suspicious activity.

-- Reach Elizabeth Evans at levans@yorkdispatch.com, 505-5429 or twitter.com/ydcrimetime.

Read more at www.ydr.com