ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

WHY THE END HAS NOT YET COME

Amplify’d from www.pacinst.com

WHY THE END HAS NOT YET COME

Christ is waiting for only one thing to happen
before He can initiate the final events of earth’s history.
As soon as the event for which He is waiting occurs, the final
acts in this drama of earth will take place, and Christ will
come to put an end to the trials of earth forever.


Revelation 12:12 tells us that Satan knows
that someday he is going to die. “Therefore rejoice, ye
heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of
the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you,
having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short
time.” Naturally Satan does not want to die. He, like most
of us, would rather live—forever. His time is running out,
and he is in a panic trying to figure out how to keep himself
alive.


Satan knows why Christ has not yet returned.
He realizes that if he can prevent the one thing for which Christ
is waiting from happening, he will be able to continue to live.
He knows that if he can keep people from realizing exactly why
Christ has delayed His return to earth, if he can keep them from
understanding the Bible, and if he can keep them from realizing
exactly what God expects of them, the event for which Christ
is waiting will not happen. Everything that Satan does on the
earth, therefore, is designed for only one thing: to keep him
alive. By his concentrated barrage of lies and propaganda, through
which he deceives the whole world, he attempts to prevent this
one event from occurring. To discover what this event is, let
us review exactly what God expects of His people.


How high is the standard God wants His people
to attain? Is it possible, for instance, after one comes to realize
and understand the situation in this world concerning sin, to
live a perfect sin-free life thereafter? Sin is defined in 1
John 3:4 as breaking God’s law. “Whosoever committeth
sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression
of the law.” Is it possible for the human being to attain
the goal of perfection in this life so that he never again breaks
any of God’s laws, the Ten Commandments? Can the human being
reach a level of character development where it is impossible
for him to commit a sin? Does God expect perfection from His
people?


Many will take exception to the thought that
it is possible for us to reach the plateau of perfection. But
before we hastily rule out this possibility, let us consider
some of the many verses of Scripture which discuss this point
and see exactly what God does expect of us and whether or not
perfection is possible for us to attain.


In Matthew 5:48 Jesus gives us a command:
“Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in
heaven is perfect.” This command for us to be perfect just
as God is perfect seems like a total impossibility to us because
Satan has instilled in our minds that we can never achieve such
perfection.


When Jesus commanded us to be perfect, He
was commanding perfect obedience to the Ten Commandments. Would
Jesus ask us to do something that we could not possibly do? Of
course not. However, man cannot achieve this state of perfection
by himself; he needs the grace and power of God in his life if
he is to accomplish this.


First of all we must understand from 2 Timothy
3:16,17 that we need the message of the entire Bible, both the
Old and New Testaments, in order to be able to reach perfection.
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable
for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness: That the man of God may be PERFECT, throughly
[thoroughly] furnished unto all good works.” Notice that
God gave us the Scriptures so “That the man of God may be
perfect.” Thus we see that the entire Bible contains the
information and instructions that we need to achieve perfection.


Ephesians 6:11 tells us to “Put on the
whole armor of God, that ye may be able to stand against the
wiles of the devil.” The whole armor of God is the whole
truth of God contained in the entire Bible. This text indicates
that if we have on this armor, we will be able to stand against
the wiles of the devil; if we can stand against the wiles of
the devil, we will be able to keep from breaking God’s law
ever again.


Speaking of the new covenant, which, you
will remember, is shown in Jeremiah 31:31-33 and Hebrews 8:10
to be God’s law written in our hearts and minds, Ezekiel
36:26,27 says, “A new heart also will I give you, and a
new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony
heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
And I will put my spirit within you, and CAUSE you to walk in
my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.”
This is a mighty promise God makes to His true people. He says
that He, Himself, will cause them to walk in His statutes. He
will be the power in the lives of His true Christians to cause
them always to obey the Ten Commandments.


Furthermore, God says that His people WILL,
indeed, keep His statutes and His laws. When God promises each
of us that He will cause us to walk in His statutes and that
we will keep His judgments and do them, how could one of God’s
people possibly say that he could never achieve this goal?


God’s causing us to walk in His statutes
is somewhat analogous to power steering on a car. Power steering
will not turn the wheels until the driver moves the steering
wheel slightly. Then the power steering takes over and moves
the wheels for him. Likewise, if we want perfection with all
our hearts and strive for this goal ourselves, God will take
over and do it for us just as He promised.


God promised that He would keep us from breaking
His law, and Jude 24 tells us that He has the power to do so.
“Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and
to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with
exceeding joy. . . .” Since Christ has the power to keep
us from falling, to keep us from breaking His law, and since
He promised that this is exactly what He will do, what excuse
do we have for ever breaking any of the Ten Commandments?


If we do not know that it is possible for
us to stop breaking God’s law, chances are we never will.
Satan, you see, has been working very hard to convince everyone
that it is impossible to reach perfection. We must realize that
we have all been deceived all our lives on this point. However,
in order to reach perfection we must want this more than anything
else in our lives.


Over and over again the Bible indicates that
God answered the prayers of Christ while He was on earth. Suppose
Christ prayed that God would keep His people from evil, from
breaking the Ten Commandments. Would God answer a prayer like
that? Of course He would. Jesus prayed that exact prayer, as
recorded in John 17:15: “I pray not that thou shouldest
take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them
from the evil.” Christ prayed that His people should remain
in the world but that God should keep them from evil. This is
exactly what God is doing for His true people, who really want
to be perfect.


That God answered this prayer is shown in
2 Thessalonians 3:3: “But the Lord is faithful, who shall
stablish you, and keep you from evil.” Evil, of course,
is sin, the breaking of any of the Ten Commandments. Since the
Lord keeps His true Christians from breaking the law, they can,
indeed, live perfect lives if this is what they desire more than
anything else.


A very important point is brought out in
the following verse. Some may get the mistaken idea that God
is simply going to take sin out of our lives, without requiring
any effort on our part. This idea is not correct, for the following
verse indicates that we are still required to resist the temptations
which will come to us. God never says that the task of overcoming
sin will not require effort on our parts. In fact, our successful
resistance to some temptations will require considerable effort.
God does promise to give us the power and the grace which, coupled
with our efforts, will make us successful. God also promises
in 1 Corinthians 10:13 that He will not allow the devil to tempt
us beyond our capacity to resist. “There hath no temptation
taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful,
who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able;
but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that
ye may be able to bear it.”


Since God is not permitting us to be tempted
beyond our capacity to resist the temptation, how can we possibly
have any excuse for sinning? Since He is not permitting us to
be tempted beyond our capacity to resist, how can we say that
it is impossible for us to stop breaking the Ten Commandments?
We sin, you see, because we have chosen to do so. We sin because
we put our desires (lusts) before God. God has done everything
to make it possible for us to resist the devil, to overcome sin
completely, and then to live perfect lives, but to achieve perfection
we must desire it more than life itself.


God again tells us, in 1 Peter 5:10, that
He, Himself, will make us perfect. “But the God of all grace,
who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, after
that ye have suffered a while, MAKE YOU PERFECT, stablish, strengthen,
settle you.” God will indeed do this, but He will never
do it against our will.


The key to perfection is that one must desire
with all his heart to be perfect and, without wavering, strive
for this goal above all others. God will not give us the power
to be perfect unless perfection is what we really want. One of
the reasons so many fail so miserably to achieve perfection is
that they are not ready to go all the way with God. They have
some pet habits they know are coming between them and God, but
they are not quite ready to give them up. Or they have some things
they want to do yet, things they know are not quite right in
God’s sight, things they know will take time and means from
His work.


We all know how easy it is to do something
when asked by someone we love. Indeed, we often take great pleasure
in obeying one whom we dearly love. Can our love for God be any
different? When our love for God exceeds our love for everyone
and everything else, we are pleased to do as He has asked. When
we cherish God above everything else, we are pleased to obey
His commandments—perfectly.


In Ephesians 4:13,14 we see again that God
expects us to be perfect. “Till we all come in the unity
of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a
perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of
Christ: That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and
fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight
of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive.”
Notice the meaning of perfect in this text: “Unto a perfect
man, unto . . . the stature . . . of Christ.” God, you see,
expects us to become as steadfast against sin as was Christ.


Does a truly born-again Christian commit
sin? The term “born-again” implies death to our lives
of sin. If we have died to sin, will we continue to break God’s
law, the Ten Commandments? The Bible definition of a born-again
Christian is found in 1 John 5:18. “We know that whosoever
is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth
himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.” Remember
that God is not permitting us to be tempted beyond our capacity
to resist. If we sin, it is because we have chosen to do so!
If we sin, we have not died to sin and are not born-again.


Thus we have seen many times using many texts
that a true born-again Christian will never break any of God’s
Ten Commandments. We have seen that God has promised that by
His grace and power each true Christian is able to overcome sin
fully and then live the remainder of his life without ever again
breaking any of God’s Ten Commandments.


The definition of a born-again Christian
is also found in 1 John 3:9. This verse not only tells us that
we can achieve perfection, but it also says that it is impossible
for a true born-again Christian to commit a sin! “Whosoever
is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in
him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.” A true
born-again Christian simply does not break God’s Ten Commandments,
for it is impossible for him to do so, as we just read! The phrase
“his seed remaineth in him” refers to God’s law
written on our hearts and in our minds. Do we have the faith
to believe this promise of God? Do we have the faith to overcome
sin — forever? Is this our desire above even life itself?
If so, perfection is not far away.


From the verses we have just been considering,
a definition of the perfection which God requires becomes apparent.
God requires that the person reach a point where it would be
impossible for him ever to sin again. Even Adam and Eve in the
Garden of Eden before sin entered were not perfect according
to this standard, for even though they had never sinned until
Satan tempted Eve, they were capable of sinning. God wants His
people to attain such quality of character that they are incapable
of breaking His law. He wants His people to reach the point where
their characters will not permit them to sin.


With so many texts which indicate that a
person can totally overcome sin and live a perfect life, why
do so many believe that this is impossible? Why is it so difficult
to believe that a Christian can live the remainder of his life
without sin? Because of the devil’s propaganda, which has
inundated this world. God tells us that He will keep us from
falling, and we believe the devil! Perhaps we do so because it
is easier on our consciences if we have an excuse, no matter
how flimsy, for doing things that we know God would not approve
of. It is time that we reject all false doctrine and accept the
truth from God, for He will do what He promises. We must have
the faith to accept what the Bible says, regardless of how wrong
or how difficult it seems to us, and believe that God will, indeed,
enable us to overcome sin totally and to live perfect lives if
we truly want Him to.


How does God cause us to walk in His statutes?
How does God enable us to keep His laws perfectly? He does this
in two ways. By helping us to develop a hatred for sin which
rivals His own in intensity. When a person hates sin as much
as God does, the option to sin is simply not open to him.


The second way is that God gives us a powerful
conscience against sins. Every time we say no to a temptation,
we are stronger to resist temptation and our consience against
sin increases in power and intensity.


Because God promised that He will enable
those of us to keep His law who really want to with all our hearts,
1 John 3:6 makes the statement that “Whosoever abideth in
him sinneth not: Whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither
known him.” Here we see that if anyone continues to sin
he does not even know the Lord. In fact verse 8 says that “He
that committeth sin is of the devil.” A born-again Christian
is one who has died to sin and has been born into a new life
free from sin. As the apostle Paul says in Romans 6:2, “How
shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?”
If we are still sinning, we are not born-again, and, as the verse
says, we don’t even know the Lord. There is no such thing
as a born-again Christian who breaks God’s Ten Commandment
law.


Not only do they who sin not know the Lord,
but 1 John 2:3,4 tells us that those who say they know the Lord
and yet break any of the Ten Commandments are liars! “And
hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.
He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments,
is a liar, and the truth is not in him.” Remember again
that God is not permitting us to be tempted beyond our capacity
to resist. If we sin, it is because we have chosen to do so;
and if we choose to do so, we certainly do not know the Lord.


Overcoming sin and living perfect lives is
entirely possible, as we have seen. Christians who have overcome
sin and have achieved perfection are described in Revelation
14:4,5: “These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever
he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits
unto God and to the Lamb. And in their mouth was found no guile:
for they are without fault before the throne of God.” They
are without fault; they are perfect.


There are other verses in the Bible which
mention those who have completely overcome sin and who keep God’s
laws perfectly. Revelation 12:17 describes these people: “And
the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with
the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God,
and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” These people are
described as keeping the commandments of God. It does not say
they keep most of them, or that they keep them sometimes. It
says that they keep them — always. Revelation 14:12 also
describes these people: “Here is the patience of the saints:
here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith
of Jesus.” It is, then, indeed possible to keep God’s
law perfectly, for these verses describe the people who do.


Actually, it is only the perfect who will
be saved to enjoy the beautiful eternity with God, for God will
not take anyone to heaven who would ever break any of His Ten
Commandments after he got there, as we see in Proverbs 2:21,22.
“The upright shall dwell in the land, and the perfect shall
remain in it. But the wicked shall be cut off from the earth,
and the transgressors shall be rooted out of it.” The perfect
shall dwell in the land.


Nahum 1:9 also tells us that no one will
ever again break any of God’s laws after sin and sinners
are destroyed. “What do ye imagine against the Lord? he
will make an utter end: affliction [sin] shall not rise up the
second time.”


Some may be worried at this point about people
who have died without having reached perfection. These people
will not necessarily be lost. God will save a person if that
person lived a proper life based on the truth that he had. This
is implied in Acts 17:30: “And the times of this ignorance
God winked at; but now commandeth all men everywhere to repent.”
God will save people who sincerely strive to obey Him, and who,
in the pure society of heaven, would realize that sin is intolerable
and immediately abide by the law; but God will never take anyone
to heaven who would break any of the Ten Commandments after he
got there. We simply do not have the capacity to judge others
at this time, and we must rely on the fact that God is totally
just and that He will do the right thing. Remember that at the
end of the millennium the entire universe votes unanimously that
Christ is totally righteous and totally just.


Why does God tell us the same things over
and over again in the Bible? We have all lived from childhood
literally in a sea of deception from the devil. We have believed
the devil’s lies all our lives, and often Bible truth seems
impossible to us. We rationalize and philosophize and explain
away the verses we will not accept; we become dogmatic and stubborn.
“Thou art obstinate, and thy neck is an iron sinew, and
thy brow brass.” (Isaiah 48:4). We must have complete faith
in God that He will not lie to us. We must believe what God tells
us in the Bible regardless of what we feel is right. Proverbs
16:25 tells us that “There is a way that seemeth right unto
a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” God tells
us things over and over again hoping that the truth will penetrate
our brows of brass.


If God told us something a thousand times,
probably most people would still not believe it. As we have seen,
He has told us repeatedly to keep the Commandments, yet most
do not even believe that the law is applicable today. We have
seen that the Lord has told us over and over again that He Himself
will make us perfect, yet most refuse to believe it. What must
God do to get through to the people of this world?


We sometimes wonder about the severe punishment
for sin which was administered in Old Testament times. God severely
punished some of the early sinners so that those living afterward
would understand that He means exactly what He says. We need
to realize that when God tells us something, we can rely upon
it. He has told us that He will keep us from sinning and that
true, born-again Christians cannot sin. We should search our
own hearts to find out why this is so difficult for us to believe.


The parable of the wheat and the tares, found
in Matthew 13:24-30, gives us an extremely important clue in
our study of why Jesus has not yet returned to gather His faithful
people from the earth.


“Another parable put he forth unto them,
saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed
good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and
sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade
was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares
also. So the servants of the householder came and said unto him,
Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then
hath it tares? He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The
servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather
them up? But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares,
ye root up also the wheat with them. Let both grow together until
the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers,
Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles
to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.”


Here we have a farmer who planted a field
of wheat. During the night his enemy came and planted tares.
Strangely, the farmer wanted to let the tares grow until the
harvest. This is usually not the case in the real world. The
farmer would pull up the weeds to allow his crop more room to
grow. What does this parable mean? Jesus explains the meaning
of this parable in Matthew 13:36-40. “Then Jesus sent the
multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came
unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of
the field. He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the
good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good
seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children
of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the
harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so
shall it be in the end of this world.”


We see that the situation on earth is symbolized
in the parable of the wheat and the tares. Christ is allowing
both the wicked and the righteous to grow together until the
harvest at the end of the world. The tares referred to here are
Bearded Darnell grass, which before ripening looks exactly like
wheat. If the seeds are eaten, however, they produce violent
nausea, convulsions, and sometimes death. Only at the time of
ripening is the difference between the Bearded Darnell grass
and the wheat apparent, for the Darnell grass turns black and
the wheat turns a golden brown.


One reason why Christ wants to allow the
wicked to flourish beside the righteous is that if He punished
the false Christians before they showed their true colors, He
would appear to be unjust, and many would fall away. The righteous
would not understand about the false Christians, thinking that
their fellow church members who were punished had been true Christians.
They would mistake the tares for wheat. Thus, they would be appalled
at what they would believe to be the injustice of God. The farmer
in the parable did not want to uproot a tare for fear that wheat
might be uprooted also. This parable, therefore, reveals the
great care with which Christ works for the salvation of everyone.
He is “not willing that any should perish.” (2 Peter
3:9).


These false Christians are the subject of
Matthew 7:21-23: “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord,
Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth
the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me
in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name?
and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many
wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew
you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” The world thinks
that they are true, but God knows differently, and they must
be permitted to “ripen” for the harvest at the end
of time so that the difference is readily apparent to all.


That Christ is waiting for the harvest is
also mentioned in James 5:7: “Be patient therefore, brethren,
unto the coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for
the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it,
until he receive the early and latter rain.” Here Jesus,
the husbandman, is pictured as waiting very patiently for the
fruit of the earth to ripen. When the fruit ripens, then follows
the harvest, which is described in Revelation 14:14-19. “And
I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat
like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown,
and in his hand a sharp sickle. And another angel came out of
the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud,
Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee
to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe. And he that sat
on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth
was reaped. And another angel came out of the temple which is
in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle. And another angel came
out from the altar, which had power over fire; and cried with
a loud cry to him that had the sharp sickle, saying, Thrust in
thy sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the
earth; for her grapes are fully ripe. And the angel thrust in
his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth,
and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God.”


We see here that the true Christians (the
wheat) and the wicked (the tares, or in this last symbolism,
the grapes of the earth) both get ripe together. When a person
first becomes interested in the message of the Bible, he begins
to study. Gradually he understands and applies his newfound knowledge
to his life, and some of his sins are forsaken. As he learns
more and more and forsakes more and more sin, he grows closer
to God and closer to the goal of perfection. This is the process
referred to in the Bible when it speaks of Christians ripening
for the harvest. The righteous are becoming more and more righteous.
Likewise, the wicked in their ripening process are becoming more
and more wicked.


Revelation 14:12 describes the end product
of this ripening process. “Here is the patience of the saints:
here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith
of Jesus.” Here we have people who indeed do keep the commandments
of God. They do not just keep some of them, and they do not slip
once in a while and sin. Here are they that keep all the commandments
all the time. Here are the perfect people. Here are they who
have successfully put sin out of their lives. Here are they who
have achieved perfection. Here is the ripened wheat for which
Christ is waiting.


Will those who achieve perfection realize
that they have done so? No, they will not. As they get closer
and closer to the goal, they get closer and closer to Christ.
They are aware of their past sins and see themselves in comparison
with Christ, and none of them will feel that he is perfect.


Christ is patiently waiting for 144,000 of
His people to achieve perfection before returning to earth to
take them to heaven. Why does He wait for 144,000 people to reach
perfection before He will return? When He was on earth He lived
a perfect life, showing us that it can be done. Satan, however,
complained that Christ could live a perfect life because He was
God in heaven, but that men could not achieve this. Another accusation
against Christ and His law.


Christ, therefore, must wait until He has
144,000 people whose characters have developed to the point where
for them sin is impossible. He can then point to them as proof
that his law can be obeyed—perfectly. Then, what can Satan
say? Nothing. To the entire universe the 144,000 prove him to
be a liar. As soon as the 144,000 perfect people appear, the
final events of earth’s history will immediately occur,
and the pain and misery of earth will come to an end.


Why the number 144,000? This is the number
of people that Christ feels is adequate to prove to the universe
that the accusations which Satan made against Him and His law
are false. This is the number which Christ feels is required
to make Satan, himself, admit that he was wrong.


It is sad that only 144,000 of the vast population
of earth will achieve this perfection of character in these last
days. The 144,000 are discussed in Revelation 14:1-5: “And
I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him
an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s
name written in their foreheads. And I heard a voice from heaven,
as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder:
and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: And
they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before
the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that
song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were
redeemed from the earth. These are they which were not defiled
with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow
the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among
men, being the first fruits unto God and to the Lamb. And in
their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before
the throne of God.” Thus we see that the 144,000 are, indeed,
the perfect people, for “they are without fault before the
throne of God.”


The phrase “not defiled with women”
is often misunderstood. This simply means that the 144,000 perfect
people do not defile their characters in the least with the false
doctrines and practices of the many false churches. A woman,
you will remember, is the symbol of a church in Bible prophecy.
These perfect people will have nothing to do with any heathen
doctrine. Their religion is the pure Word of God. Notice that
the 144,000 are redeemed from among men. They do not die. They
are the righteous living when Christ returns.


The 144,000 are again mentioned in Revelation
7:1-4: “And after these things I saw four angels standing
on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the
earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the
sea, nor on any tree. And I saw another angel ascending from
the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with
a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt
the earth and the sea, Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the
sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God
in their foreheads. And I heard the number of them which were
sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand
of all the tribes of the children of Israel.” Notice verse
four is very specific about the number that were sealed.


The Bible text just quoted implies that after
the 144,000 are sealed the earth is inundated with great tribulation.
The 144,000 are the only living Christians during the great tribulation
and who go through the seven last plagues.


Revelation 14:3 mentions that the 144,000
sing a song that no others can know. This song refers to their
experience of going through the terrible time of trouble, the
seven last plagues.


Human probation will close shortly, and after
it closes Christ will no longer forgive sins. Revelation 22:11,12
shows that probation will close just before Christ returns to
this earth. “He that is unjust, let him be unjust still:
and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that
is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy,
let him be holy still. And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward
is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.”
After the close of probation, none of the wicked will be converted.
They will remain wicked for the remainder of their lives.


At the beginning of this great tribulation,
Jesus will put off His priestly robes and don His kingly garments.
At this time there will no longer be a high priest in the heavenly
sanctuary to mediate for sinful man and forgive sins. To show
that human beings can, indeed, obey the Law of God perfectly
and live without sin and without a mediator to forgive sins,
God must allow Satan to do anything he wants to these people
to try to make them sin. This is what causes the seven last plagues.


Most people blame God for the plagues, and
indeed, the Bible describes angels as pouring out the seven last
plagues on the earth. But, we know that God takes responsibility
for things that happen on earth even though He does not do them
because He could prevent them from happening if He wanted to.
Perhaps the one verse that shows most clearly that God does not
cause the plagues is Revelation 15:8. “And the temple was
filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power;
and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven
plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled.” This verse
shows God withdrawing into the temple and isolating Himself until
the plagues are finished, showing that He has nothing to do with
the plagues.


The plauges are the result of God allowing
Satan to have a free reign in the earth at this time, and Satan
cannot hold things together. The plagues are the result.


Continuing with Revelation 7:5-8 we see that
the 144,000 come from the twelve tribes of the children of Israel,
12,000 from each tribe. The term “Israel”, which means
“ruling with God”, refers to the true Christians in
the world today. (Galatians 3:28,29). If God’s true people
today are Israel, how, then, can they be from the twelve tribes
of the children of Israel?


“Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve
thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand.
Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe
of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim
were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed
twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand.
Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe
of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Zabulon
were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed
twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve
thousand.”


We can get some insight into the meaning
of these different tribes by considering Genesis 49:1-27. These
verses describe the last testimony Israel (Jacob) gave to his
twelve sons just before his death. Notice that this is a prophecy
for the last days, the days in which we are living. “And
Jacob called unto his sons, and said, Gather yourselves together,
that I may tell you that which shall befall you in the last days.
Gather yourselves together, and hear, ye sons of Jacob: and hearken
unto Israel your father.” Israel then proceeded to describe
the character of each of his sons:


“Reuben, thou art my firstborn, my might,
and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity,
and the excellency of power: Unstable as water, thou shalt not
excel; because thou wentest up to thy father’s bed; then
defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.


“Simeon and Levi are brethren; instruments
of cruelty are in their habitations. O my soul, come not thou
into their secret; unto their assembly, mine honour, be not thou
united: for in their anger they slew a man, and in their self-will
they digged down a wall. Cursed be their anger, for it was fierce;
and their wrath, for it was cruel: I will divide them in Jacob,
and scatter them in Israel.


“Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren
shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies;
thy father’s children shall bow down before thee. Judah
is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone
up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion;
who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah,
nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and
unto him shall the gathering of the people be. Binding his foal
unto the vine, and his ass’s colt unto the choice vine;
he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood
of grapes: His eyes shall be red with wine, and his teeth white
with milk.


“Zebulun shall dwell at the haven of
the sea; and he shall be for an haven of ships; and his border
shall be unto Zidon.


“Issachar is a strong ass couching between
two burdens: And he saw that rest was good, and the land that
it was pleasant; and bowed his shoulder to bear, and became a
servant unto tribute.


“Dan shall judge his people, as one
of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an
adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider
shall fall backward. I have waited for thy salvation, O Lord.


“Gad, a troop shall overcome him: but
he shall overcome at the last.


“Out of Asher his bread shall be fat,
and he shall yield royal dainties.


“Naphtali is a hind let loose: he giveth
goodly words.


“Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a
fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall: The
archers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him, and hated him:
But his bow abode in strength, and the arms of his hands were
made strong by the hands of the mighty God of Jacob; from thence
is the shepherd, the stone of Israel: Even by the God of thy
father, who shall help thee; and by the Almighty, who shall bless
thee with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that
lieth under, blessings of the breasts and of the womb: The blessings
of thy father have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors
unto the utmost bound of the everlasting hills: they shall be
on the head of Joseph, and on the crown of the head of him that
was separate from his brethren.


“Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in
the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide
the spoil.”


Thus Israel described the characters of each
of his sons. Remember that this was a prophecy for the last days.
These twelve personalities represent the twelve character groups
of mankind. Therefore, from each of these twelve different character
groups will come twelve thousand to make up the 144,000. How
perfectly Christ has planned for this drama of earth and for
the salvation of mankind! So that there can be no accusations
by Satan that one character type had advantages over others,
Christ’s perfect people, His 144,000, will come equally
from every temperament, indicating that salvation is equally
available for everyone in the world. It is totally up to the
individual whether he will obey the Lord and be saved or not.


Even heathenism, through astrology, recognizes
that there are twelve different character groups into which the
human race falls, each under a different sign of the zodiac.
Incidentally, God tells us in Jeremiah 10:2 to have nothing to
do with astrology. “Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way
of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven (signs
of the zodiac); for the heathen are dismayed at them.”


The 144,000 will not be the only ones to
be saved. After Revelation 7:1-8 describes the 144,000, consisting
of twelve thousand from each character type, Revelation 7:9 describes
a vast multitude which are also saved. “After this I beheld,
and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all
nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before
the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and
palms in their hands.” These are the righteous people of
all ages who will be resurrected to enjoy an abundant life in
God’s eternity when Christ returns.


Thus we see that before He can return to
earth and put an end to sin forever, Christ must wait for His
144,000 perfect people. Therefore, when the Lord will return
is really up to us.


Revelation 19:7 also shows most clearly that
the Lord is waiting for his people to get themselves ready before
He will return to the earth. “Let us be glad and rejoice,
and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come,
and his wife hath made herself ready.” Second Corinthians
11:2 tells us that His church, His people, are to be presented
to Him as His bride. “For I am jealous over you with godly
jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may
present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.” When His true
church, His wife, makes herself ready—when 144,000 of her
members reach the goal of perfection—the Lord will return
to earth.


How long will we keep Him waiting? How many
more people will have to suffer and die before we understand
that we are keeping Christ from returning? How many more millions
of people will be butchered by the communists and other ruthless
dictators around the world before we realize that Christ is waiting
for us? How many more unborn babies will be murdered in the abortion
clinics of the world before we realize that Christ is waiting
for us to get ready for His return?


We think too much of having fun. Many plan
all week long what they are going to do on the weekend to have
fun, and as they have their fun, millions suffer. People waste
a fourth of their lives in front of television sets absorbing
the devil’s lies by the millions, as he prepares this world
for the final crisis.


Suppose Christ has 143,999 people and is
waiting for one more. Suppose also that the last person will
be you. How will you feel to learn of the misery, pain, suffering,
and death many people were caused to bear because you were not
quite ready, because you wanted to do other things before you
surrendered your life fully to Christ, and He had to wait for
you?


We have seen that Christ Himself gives us
power to be perfect. He has promised that we will never be tempted
beyond our ability to resist the temptation. Therefore, there
can be no excuse for breaking God’s Ten Commandment law.
Christ has done everything necessary for each one of us to be
able to reach perfection. There can be no excuse for keeping
Christ waiting any longer.


If we sin after we have once understood,
it is because we have willingly chosen to serve ourselves instead
of our Creator. We have made a conscious choice to break God’s
law. Once a person understands God’s word and becomes a
true follower of Christ, he will never permit himself to sin,
for sin will be as loathsome to him as it is to God. Remember,
that 1 John 3:9 tells us that it is impossible for a true born-again
Christian to sin.


It is time to realize that God is in earnest.
Sin is despicable in His sight, and it is time for His people
to understand this. Perfection, you see, is not only possible;
it is what God requires.


Often one hears the expression, “We
must finish the work so the Lord will return.” There are
different ideas as to just what this work is. We have seen that
one of the jobs which must be done is on the individual, by himself,
with the help, the grace, and the power of God, who is able to
keep us from falling. Let us get to this work, and, indeed, finish
it quickly so that God can end this drama of earth and cleanse
the universe of sin forever.


“Through the plan of redemption, God
has provided means for subduing every sinful trait, and resisting
every temptation, however strong. The strongest temptation is
no excuse for sin. However great the pressure brought to bear
upon the soul, transgression is our own act. It is not in the
power of earth or hell to compel any one to sin. The will must
consent, the heart must yield, or passion cannot overbear reason,
nor iniquity triumph over righteousness. If you will stand under
the bloodstained banner of Prince Emmanuel, faithfully doing
His service, you need never yield to temptation; for One stands
by your side who is able to keep you from falling.”

Maranatha, p. 225

Read more at www.pacinst.com
 

HOW THE UNITED STATES IS BEING DESTROYED

Amplify’d from www.pacinst.com
HOW THE UNITED STATES IS BEING
DESTROYED
Introduction

At the close of the Constitutional Convention
in 1787, Benjamin Franklin told an inquisitive citizen that the
delegates to the Constitutional Convention gave the people “a
Republic, if you can keep it.” We should apologize to Mr.
Franklin. It is obvious that the Republic is gone, for we are
wallowing in a pure democracy against which the Founders had
strongly warned.


Madison, the father of the Constitution, could
not have been more explicit in his fear and concern for democracies.
Democracies,” he said, “have ever been
spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found
incompatible with personal security or the rights of property;
and have in general been as short in their lives as they have
been violent in their death.


If Madison’s assessment was correct,
it behooves those of us in Congress to take note and decide,
indeed, whether the Republic has vanished, when it occurred,
and exactly what to expect in the way of “turbulence,
contention
, and violence.” And above all else,
what can we and what will we do about it?


The turbulence seems self-evident. Domestic
welfare programs are not sustainable and do not accomplish their
stated goals. State and federal spending and deficits are out
of control. Terrorism and uncontrollable fear undermine our sense
of well-being. Hysterical reactions to dangers not yet seen prompt
the people at the prodding of the politicians to readily sacrifice
their liberties in vain hope that someone else will take care
of them and guarantee their security. With these obvious signs
of a failed system all around us, there seems to be more determination
than ever to antagonize the people of the world by pursuing a
world empire. Nation building, foreign intervention, preemptive
war, and global government drive our foreign policy. There seems
to be complete aversion to defending the Republic and the Constitution
that established it.


The Founders clearly understood the dangers
of a democracy. Edmund Randolph of Virginia described the effort
to deal with the issue at the Constitutional Convention: “The
general object was to produce a cure for the evils under which
the United States labored; that in tracing these evils to their
origins, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies
of democracy.


These strongly held views regarding the evils
of democracy and the benefits of a Constitutional Republic were
shared by all the Founders. For them, a democracy meant centralized
power, controlled by majority opinion, which was up for grabs
and therefore completely arbitrary.


In contrast, a Republic was decentralized
and representative in nature, with the government’s purpose
strictly limited by the Constitution to the protection of liberty
and private property ownership. They believed the majority should
never be able to undermine this principle and that the government
must be tightly held in check by constitutional restraints. The
difference between a democracy and a republic was simple. Would
we live under the age-old concept of the rule of man or the enlightened
rule of law?


A constitution in and by itself does not guarantee
liberty in a republican form of government. Even a perfect constitution
with this goal in mind is no better than the moral standards
and desires of the people. Although the United States Constitution
was by far the best ever written for the protection of liberty,
with safeguards against the dangers of a democracy, it too was
flawed from the beginning. Instead of guaranteeing liberty equally
for all people, the authors themselves yielded to the democratic
majority’s demands that they compromise on the issue of
slavery. This mistake, plus others along the way, culminated
in a Civil War that surely could have been prevented with clearer
understanding and a more principled approach to the establishment
of a constitutional republic.


Subsequently, the same urge to accommodate
majority opinion, while ignoring the principles of individual
liberty, led to some other serious errors. Even amending the
Constitution in a proper fashion to impose alcohol prohibition
turned out to be a disaster. Fortunately this was rectified after
a short time with its repeal.


But today, the American people accept drug
prohibition, a policy as damaging to liberty as alcohol prohibition.
A majority vote in Congress has been enough to impose this very
expensive and failed program on the American people, without
even bothering to amend the Constitution. It has been met with
only minimal but, fortunately, growing dissent. For the first
150 years of our history, when we were much closer to being a
true republic, there were no federal laws dealing with this serious
medical problem of addiction.


The ideas of democracy, not the principles
of liberty, were responsible for passage of the 16th Amendment.
It imposed the income tax on the American people and helped to
usher in the modern age of the welfare/warfare state. Unfortunately,
the 16th Amendment has not been repealed, as was the 18th. As
long as the 16th Amendment is in place, the odds are slim that
we can restore a constitutional republic dedicated to liberty.
The personal income tax is more than symbolic of a democracy;
it is a predictable consequence.


Transition to Democracy


The transition from republic to democracy
was gradual and insidious. It seeds were sown early in our history.
In many ways, the Civil War and its aftermath laid the foundation
for the acute erosion that took place over the entire 20th century.
Chronic concern about war and economic downturns — events
caused by an intrusive government’s failure to follow the
binding restraints of the Constitution — allowed majority
demands to supersede the rights of the minority.


By the end of the 20th century, majority opinion
had become the determining factor in all that government does.
The rule of law was cast aside, leaving the Constitution a shell
of what it once was- a Constitution with rules that guaranteed
a republic with limited and regional government and protection
of personal liberty. The marketplace, driven by voluntary cooperation,
private property ownership, and sound money was severely undermined
with the acceptance of the principles of a true democracy.


Unfortunately, too many people confuse the
democratic elections of leaders of a republic for democracy by
accepting the rule of majority opinion in all affairs. For majorities
to pick leaders is one thing. It is something quite different
for majorities to decide what rights are, to redistribute property,
to tell people how to manage their personal lives, and to promote
undeclared, unconstitutional wars.


The majority is assumed to be in charge today
and can do whatever it pleases. If the majority has not yet sanctioned
some desired egregious action demanded by special interests,
the propaganda machine goes into operation, and the pollsters
relay the results back to the politicians who are seeking legitimacy
in their endeavors. The rule of law and the Constitution have
become irrelevant, and we live by constant polls.


This trend toward authoritarian democracy
was tolerated because, unlike a military dictatorship, it was
done in the name of benevolence, fairness, and
equity. The pretense of love and compassion by those who
desire to remold society and undermine the Constitution convinced
the recipients, and even the victims, of its necessity. Since
it was never a precipitous departure from the republic, the gradual
erosion of liberty went unnoticed.


However, it is encouraging that more and more
citizens are realizing just how much has been lost by complacency.
The resolution to the problems we face as a result of this profound
transition to pure democracy will be neither quick nor painless.
This transition has occurred even though the word “democracy”
does not appear in the Constitution or in the Declaration of
Independence, and the Founders explicitly denounced it.


Over the last hundred years, the goal of securing
individual liberties within the framework of a constitutional
republic has been replaced with incessant talk of democracy and
fairness.


Rallying support for our ill-advised participation
in World War I, Wilson spoke glowingly of “making the
world safe for democracy
,” and never mentioned national
security. This theme has, to this day, persisted in all our foreign
affairs. Neo-conservatives now brag of their current victories
in promoting what they call “Hard Wilsonism.”


A true defense of self-determination for
all people
, the necessary ingredient of a free society, is
ignored. Self-determination implies separation of smaller government
from the larger entities that we witnessed in the breakup of
the Soviet Union. This notion contradicts the goal of pure democracy
and world government. A single world government is the ultimate
goal of all social egalitarians who are unconcerned with liberty.


Current Understanding


Today the concepts of rights and property
ownership are completely arbitrary. Congress, the courts, presidents
and bureaucrats arbitrarily “legislate” on a daily
basis, seeking only the endorsement of the majority. Although
the republic was designed to protect the minority against the
dictates of the majority, today we find the reverse. The republic
is no longer recognizable.


Supporters of democracy are always quick to
point out one of the perceived benefits of this system is the
redistribution of wealth by government force to the poor. Although
this may be true in limited fashion, the champions of this system
never concern themselves with the victims from whom the wealth
is stolen. The so-called benefits are short-lived, because democracy
consumes wealth with little concern for those who produce it.
Eventually the programs cannot be funded, and the dependency
that has developed precipitates angry outcries for even more
“fairness.” Since reversing the tide against liberty
is so difficult, this unworkable system inevitably leads to various
forms of tyranny.


As our republic crumbles, voices of protest
grow louder. The central government becomes more authoritarian
with each crisis. As the quality of education plummets,
the role of the federal government is expanded. As the quality
of medical care collapses
, the role of the federal government
in medicine is greatly increased. Foreign policy failures
precipitate cries for more intervention abroad and an even greater
empire. Cries for security grow louder, and concern for liberty
languishes.


Attacks on our homeland prompt massive increase
in the bureaucracy to protect us from all dangers, seen and imagined.
The prime goal and concern of the Founders, the protection of
liberty, is ignored. Those expressing any serious concern for
personal liberty are condemned for their self-centeredness and
their lack of patriotism.


Even if we could defeat al Qaeda, which surely
is a worthwhile goal, it would do little to preserve our liberties,
while ignoring the real purpose of our government. Another enemy
would surely replace it, just as the various groups of barbarians
never left the Roman Empire alone once its internal republican
structure collapsed.


Democracy Subverts Liberty and
Undermines Prosperity


Once it becomes acceptable to change the rules
by majority vote, there are no longer any limits on the power
of the government. When the Constitution can be subverted by
mere legislative votes, executive orders or judicial decrees,
constitutional restraints on the government are eliminated. This
process was rare in the early years of our history, but now it
is routine.


Democracy is promoted in the name of fairness
in an effort to help some special-interest group gain a benefit
that it claims it needs or is entitled to. If only one small
group were involved, nothing would come of the demands. But coalitions
develop, and the various groups ban together to form a majority
to vote themselves all those things that they expect others to
provide for them.


Although the motivating factor is frequently
the desire for the poor to better themselves through the willingness
of others to sacrifice for what they see as good cause, the process
is doomed to failure.



Governments are inefficient and the desired
goals are rarely achieved.


Administrators, who benefit, perpetuate the
programs.


Wealthy elites learn to benefit from the system
in a superior fashion over the poor, because they know how to
skim the cream off the top of all the programs designed for the
disadvantaged. They join the various groups in producing the
majority vote needed to fund their own special projects.


Take Public Housing . . .


Public financing of housing, for instance,
benefits builders, bureaucrats, insurance companies, and financial
institutions, while the poor end up in drug-infested, crime-ridden
housing projects. For the same reason, not only do business leaders
not object to the system, but they also become strong supporters
of welfare programs and foreign aid.


Big business strongly supports programs like
the Export/Import Bank, the IMF, the World Bank, farm subsidies,
and military adventurism. Tax-code revisions and government contracts
mean big profits for those who are well-connected. Concern for
individual liberty is pushed to the bottom of the priority list
for both the poor and rich welfare recipients.


Prohibitions placed in the Constitution against
programs that serve special interests are the greatest threat
to the current system of democracy under which we operate. In
order for the benefits to continue, politicians must reject the
rule of law and concern themselves only with the control of majority
opinion.
Sadly, that is the job of almost all politicians.
It is clearly the motivation behind the millions spent on constant
lobbying, as well as the billions spent on promoting the right
candidates in each election.


Those who champion liberty are rarely heard
from. The media, banking, insurance, airlines, transportations,
financial institutions, government employees, the military-industrial
complex, the educational system, and the medical community are
all dependent on government appropriations, resulting in a high-stakes
system of government.


Democracy encourages the mother of all political
corruption — the use of political money to buy influence.
If the dollars spent in this effort represent the degree to which
democracy has won out over the rule of law and the Constitution,
it looks like the American republic is left wanting. Billions
are spent on the endeavor.


Money in politics is the key to implementing
policy and swaying democratic majorities. It is seen by most
Americans, and rightly so, as a negative and a danger. Yet the
response, unfortunately, is only more of the same. More laws
tinkering with freedom of expression are enacted, in hopes that
regulating sums of private money thrown into the political system
will curtail the abuse. But failing to understand the cause of
the problem, lack of respect for the Constitution, and obsession
with legislative relativity dictated by the majority serve only
to further undermine the rule of law.


Be Prepared: The Dangers of Pure
Democracy are Known


We were adequately warned about the problem.
Democracies lead to chaos, violence and bankruptcy. The
demands of the majority are always greater than taxation alone
can provide. Therefore, control over the monetary and banking
system is required for democracies to operate. It was no accident
in 1913, when the dramatic shift toward a democracy became pronounced,
that the Federal Reserve was established.
A personal income
tax was imposed as well. At the same time, popular election of
Senators was instituted, and our foreign policy became aggressively
interventionist.


Even with an income tax, the planners for
war and welfare (a guns and butter philosophy) knew that it would
become necessary to eliminate restraints on the printing of money.
Private counterfeiting was a heinous crime, but government counterfeit
and fractional-reserve banking were required to seductively
pay for the majority’s demands. It is for this reason that
democracies always bring about currency debasement through inflation
of the money supply.


Some of the planners of today clearly understand
the process and others, out of ignorance, view central-bank money
creation as a convenience with little danger. That’s where
they are wrong. Even though the wealthy and the bankers support
paper money — believing they know how to protect against
its ill effects — many of them are eventually dragged down
in the economic downturns that always develop.


It’s not a new era that they have
created for us today, but more of the same endured throughout
history by so many other nations.

The belief that democratic demands can be financed by deficits,
credit creation and taxation is based on false hope and failure
to see how it contributes to the turbulence as the democracy
collapses.


Once a nation becomes a democracy, the
whole purpose of government changes.

Instead of the government’s goal being that of guaranteeing
liberty, equal justice, private property, and voluntary exchange,
the government embarks on the impossible task of achieving economic
equality, micromanaging the economy, and protecting citizens
from themselves and all their activities. The destruction of
the wealth-building process, which is inherent in a free society,
is never anticipated. Once it’s realized that it has been
undermined, it is too late to easily reverse the attacks against
limited government and personal liberty.


Democracy, by necessity, endorses special-interest
interventionism, inflationism, and corporatism. In order to carry
out the duties now expected of the government, power must be
transferred from the citizens to the politicians. The only thing
left is to decide which group or groups have the greatest influence
over the government officials. As the wealth of the nation dwindles,
competition between the special-interest groups grows more intense
and becomes the dominant goal of political action. Restoration
of liberty, the market and personal responsibility are of little
interest and are eventually seen as impractical.


Power and public opinion become crucial
factors in determining the direction of all government expenditures.
Although both major parties now accept the principles
of rule by majority and reject the rule of law, the beneficiaries
for each party are generally different, although they frequently
overlap. Propaganda, demagoguery, and control of the educational
system and the media
are essential to directing the distribution
of the loot the government steals from those who are still honestly
working for a living.


The greater problem is that nearly everyone
receives some government benefit, and at the same time contributes
to the Treasury. Most hope they will get back more than they
pay in and, therefore, go along with the firmly entrenched system.
Others, who understand and would choose to opt out and assume
responsibility for themselves, aren’t allowed to and are
forced to participate. The end only comes with a collapse
of the system, since a gradual and logical reversal of the inexorable
march toward democratic socialism is unachievable.


Soviet-style communism dramatically collapsed
once it was recognized that it could no longer function and a
better system replaced it. It became no longer practical to pursue
token reforms like those that took place over its 70-year history.


The turmoil and dangers of pure democracy
are known. We should get prepared. But it will be the clarity
with which we plan its replacement that determines the amount
of pain and suffering endured during the transition to another
system. Hopefully, the United States Congress and other government
leaders will come to realize the seriousness of our current situation
and replace the business-as-usual attitude, regardless
of political demands and growing needs of a boisterous majority.


Simply stated, our wealth is running out,
and the affordability of democracy is coming to an end.


History reveals that once majorities can vote
themselves largesse, the system is destined to collapse from
within. But in order to maintain the special-interest system
for as long as possible, more and more power must be given to
an ever-expanding central government — which of course only
makes matters worse.


The economic shortcomings of such a system
are easily understood. What is too often ignored is that the
flip side of delivering power to government is the loss of liberty
to the individual. This loss of liberty causes exactly what the
government doesn’t want — less productive citizens
who cannot pay taxes.


Even before 9/11, these trends were in place
and proposals were abundant for restraining liberty. Since 9/11,
the growth of centralized government and the loss of privacy
and personal freedoms have significantly accelerated.


It is in dealing with homeland defense and
potential terrorist attacks that the domestic social programs
and the policy of foreign intervention are coming together and
precipitating a rapid expansion of the state and erosion of liberty.
Like our social welfarism at home, our foreign meddling and empire
building abroad are a consequence of our becoming a pure democracy.


Foreign Affairs and Democracy


As expected, the dramatic shift away from
republicanism that occurred in 1913 led to a bold change of purpose
in foreign affairs. The goal of “making the world safe for
democracy” was forcefully put forth by President Wilson.
Protecting national security had become too narrow a goal and
selfish in purpose. An obligation for spreading democracy became
a noble obligation backed by a moral commitment, every bit as
utopian as striving for economic equality in an egalitarian society
here at home.


With the growing affection for democracy,
it was no giant leap to assume that majority opinion should mold
personal behavior. It was no mere coincidence that the 18th Amendment
— alcohol prohibition — was passed in 1919.


Ever since 1913, all our presidents have
endorsed meddling in the internal affairs of other nations,
and have given generous support to the notion that
a world government would facilitate the goals of democratic welfare
or socialism. On a daily basis, we hear that we must be prepared
to spend our money and use our young people to police the entire
world in order to spread democracy. Whether in Venezuela or Columbia,
Afghanistan or Pakistan, Iraq or Iran, Korea or Vietnam, our
intervention is always justified with a tone of moral arrogance
that “it’s for their own good.”


Our policymakers promote democracy as a cure-all
for the various complex problems of the world. Unfortunately,
the propaganda machine is able to hide the real reasons for our
empire building. “Promoting democracy” overseas merely
becomes a slogan for doing things that the powerful and influential
strive to do for their own benefit. To get authority for these
overseas pursuits, all that is required of the government is
that the majority be satisfied with the stated goals, no matter
how self-serving they may be. The rule of law, that is, constitutional
restraint, is ignored.
But as successful as the policy may
be on the short run and as noble as it may be portrayed, it is
a major contributing factor to the violence and chaos that eventually
come from pure democracy.


There is abundant evidence that the pretense
of spreading democracy contradicts the very policies we are pursuing.
We preach about democratic elections, but we are only too willing
to accept some for-the-moment friendly dictator who actually
overthrew a democratically elected leader or to interfere in
some foreign election.


This is the case with Pakistan’s Mushariff.
For a temporary alliance, he reaps hundreds of millions of dollars,
even though strong evidence exists that the Pakistanis have harbored
and trained al Qaeda terrorists
, that they have traded weapons
with North Korea, and that they possess weapons of mass destruction.
No one should be surprised that the Arabs are confused by our
overtures of friendship. We have just recently promised $28 billion
to Turkey to buy their support for Persian Gulf War II.


Our support of Saudi Arabia, in spite of its
ties to al Qaeda through financing and training, is totally
ignored by those obsessed with going to war against Iraq. Saudi
Arabia is the furthest thing from a democracy. As a matter of
fact, if democratic elections were permitted, the Saudi government
would be overthrown by a bin Laden ally.


Those who constantly preach global government
and democracy ought to consider the outcome of their philosophy
in a hypothetical Mid-East regional government. If these people
were asked which country in this region possesses weapons of
mass destruction, has a policy of oppressive occupation, and
constantly defies UN Security council resolutions, the vast majority
would overwhelmingly name Israel. Is this ludicrous? No, this
is what democracy is all about and what can come from a one-man,
one-vote philosophy.


U.S. policy supports the overthrow of the
democratically elected Chavez government in Venezuela, because
we don’t like the economic policy it pursues. We support
a military takeover as long as the new dictator will do as we
tell him.


There is no creditability in our contention
that we really want to impose democracy on other nations. Yet
promoting democracy is the public justification for our foreign
intervention. It sounds so much nicer than saying we’re
going to risk the lives of our young people and massively tax
our citizens to secure the giant oil reserves in Iraq.


After we take over Iraq, how long would one
expect it to take until there are authentic nationwide elections
in that country? The odds of that happening in even a hundred
years are remote. It’s virtually impossible to imagine a
time when democratic elections would ever occur for the election
of leaders in a constitutional republic dedicated for protection
of liberty any place in the region.


Foreign Policy, Welfare, and 9/11


The tragedy of 9/11 and its aftermath dramatize
so clearly how a flawed foreign policy has served to encourage
the majoritarians determined to run everyone’s life.


Due to its natural inefficiencies and tremendous
costs, a failing welfare state requires an ever-expanding authoritarian
approach to enforce mandates, collect the necessary revenues,
and keep afloat an unworkable system. Once the people grow to
depend on government subsistence, they demand its continuation.


Excessive meddling in the internal affairs
of other nations and involving ourselves in every conflict around
the globe has not endeared the United States to the oppressed
of the world.



The Japanese are tired of us.


The South Koreans are tired of us.


The Europeans are tired of us.


The Central Americans are tired of us.


The Filipinos are tired of us.


And above all, the Arab Muslims are tired
of us.


Angry and frustrated by our persistent bullying
and disgusted with having their own government bought and controlled
by the United States, joining a radical Islamic movement was
a natural and predictable consequence for Muslims.


We believe bin Laden when he takes credit
for an attack on the West, and we believe him when he warns us
of an impending attack. But we refuse to listen to his explanation
of why he and his allies are at war with us.


Bin Laden’s claims are straightforward.
The U.S. defiles Islam with military bases on holy land in Saudi
Arabia, its initiation of war against Iraq, with 12 years of
persistent bombing, and its dollars and weapons being used against
the Palestinians as the Palestinian territory shrinks and Israel’s
occupation expands. There will be no peace in the world for
the next 50 years or longer if we refuse to believe why those
who are attacking us do it.


To dismiss terrorism as the result of Muslims
hating us because we’re rich and free is one of the greatest
foreign-policy frauds ever perpetrated on the American people.
Because the propaganda machine, the media, and the government
have restated this so many times, the majority now accept it
at face value. And the administration gets the political cover
it needs to pursue a “holy” war for democracy against
the infidels who hate us for our goodness.


Polling on the matter is followed closely
and, unfortunately, is far more important than the rule of
law
. Do we hear the pundits talk of constitutional restraints
on the Congress and the administration? No, all we ever hear
are reassurances that the majority supports the President; therefore
it must be all right.


The terrorists’ attacks on us, though
never justified, are related to our severely flawed foreign policy
of intervention. They also reflect the shortcomings of a bureaucracy
that is already big enough to know everything it needs to know
about any impending attack but too cumbersome to do anything
about it.
Bureaucratic weaknesses within a fragile welfare
state provide a prime opportunity for those whom we antagonize
through our domination over world affairs and global wealth to
take advantage of our vulnerability.


But what has been our answer to the shortcomings
of policies driven by manipulated majority opinion?


We have responded by massively increasing
the federal government’s policing activity to hold American
citizens in check and make sure we are well-behaved and pose
no threat, while massively expanding our aggressive presence
around the world. There is no possible way these moves can make
us more secure against terrorism, yet they will accelerate our
march toward national bankruptcy with a currency collapse.


Relying on authoritarian democracy and domestic
and international meddling only move us sharply away from a constitutional
republic and the rule of law and toward the turbulence of a decaying
democracy, about which Madison and others had warned.


The Utopian Nightmare of One-World
Government


Once the goal of liberty is replaced by a
preconceived notion of the benefits and the moral justifications
of a democracy, a trend toward internationalism and world government
follows.


We certainly witnessed this throughout the
20th century. Since World War II, we have failed to follow the
Constitution in taking this country to war, but instead have
deferred to the collective democratic wisdom of the United Nations.


Once it’s recognized that ultimate authority
comes from an international body, whether the United Nations,
NATO, the WTO, the World Bank, or the IMF, the contest becomes
a matter of who holds the reins of power and is able to dictate
what is perceived as the will of the people (of the world). In
the name of democracy, just as it is done in Washington, powerful
nations with the most money will control UN policy. Bribery,
threats, and intimidation are common practices used to achieve
a “democratic” consensus-no matter how controversial
and short-lived the benefits.


Can one imagine what it might be like if a
true worldwide democracy existed and the United Nations were
controlled by a worldwide, one man/one vote philosophy? The masses
of China and India could vote themselves whatever they needed
from the more prosperous western countries. How long would
a world system last based on this absurdity? Yet this is the
principle that we’re working so hard to impose on ourselves
and others around the world
.


In spite of the great strides made toward
one-world government based on egalitarianism, I’m optimistic
that this utopian nightmare will never come to fruition. I have
already made the case that here at home powerful special interests
take over controlling majority opinion, making sure fairness
in distribution is never achieved. This fact causes resentment
and becomes so expensive that the entire system becomes unstable
and eventually collapses.


The same will occur internationally, even
if it miraculously did not cause conflict among the groups demanding
the loot confiscated from the producing individuals (or countries).
Democratic socialism is so destructive to production of wealth
that it must fail, just as socialism failed under Soviet Communism.
We have a long way to go before old-fashioned nationalism is
dead and buried. In the meantime, the determination of those
promoting democratic socialism will cause great harm to
many people before its chaotic end and we rediscover the basic
principle responsible for all of human progress.


Paying for Democracy


With the additional spending to wage war against
terrorism at home, while propping up an ever-increasing expensive
and failing welfare state, and the added funds needed to police
the world — all in the midst of a recession
we are destined to see an unbelievably huge explosion of deficit
spending.


Raising taxes won’t help. Borrowing the
needed funds for the budgetary deficit — plus the daily
borrowing from foreigners required to finance our ever-growing
current account deficit — will put tremendous pressure on
the dollar.


The time will come when the Fed will no longer
be able to dictate low interest rates. Reluctance of foreigners
to lend, the exorbitant size of our borrowing needs, and the
risk premium will eventually send interest rates upward. Price
inflation will accelerate, and the cost of living for all Americans
will increase. Under these conditions, most Americans will face
a decline in their standard of living.


Faced with this problem of paying for past
and present excess spending, borrowing and inflating of
the money supply has already begun in earnest. Many retirees,
depending on their 401k funds and other retirement programs,
are suffering the ill-effects of the stock market crash —
a phenomenon that still has a long way to go. Depreciating
the dollar by printing excessive money, like the Fed is doing,
will eventually devastate the purchasing power of those retirees
who are dependent on Social Security. Government cost-of-living
increases will never be able to keep up with this loss. The reality
is that we will not be able to inflate, tax, spend or borrow
our way out of this mess that the Congress has delivered to the
American people. The demands that come with pure democracy
always lead to an unaffordable system that ends with economic
turmoil and political upheaval.


Tragically, the worse the problems get, the
louder is the demand for more of the same government programs
that caused the problems in the first place, both domestic and
international. Weaning off of government programs and getting
away from foreign meddling because of political pressure are
virtually impossible. The end comes only after economic forces
make it clear we can no longer afford to pay for the extravagance
that comes from democratic dictates.


Democracy is the most expensive form of government.
There is no “king” with an interest in preserving the
nation’s capital. Everyone desires something, and the special-interest
groups, banding together, dictate to the politicians exactly
what they need and want. Politicians are handsomely rewarded
for being “effective,” that is, getting the benefits
for the groups that support them
. Effectiveness is never
measured by efforts and achievements in securing liberty, even
though it’s the most important element in a prosperous and
progressive world.


Spending is predictable in a democracy, especially
one that endorses foreign interventionism. It always goes up,
both in nominal terms and in percentage of the nation’s
wealth.


Paying for it can be quite complicated. The
exact method is less consequential than the percent of the nation’s
wealth the government commands. Borrowing and central-bank credit
creation are generally used — they are less noticeable,
but more deceitful, than direct taxation (which would amount
to “pay as we go”). If direct taxation were accomplished
through monthly checks written by each taxpayer, the cost of
government would immediately be revealed, and the democratic
con-game would end much more quickly.


The withholding principle was devised to make
paying for the programs the majority demanded seem less painful.
Passing on debt to the next generation through borrowing is also
a popular way to pay for welfare and warfare.


Inflation — The Most Sinister
Tax of All


Because the effect of inflating a currency
to pay the bills is difficult to understand, and the victims
are hard to identify, inflation is the most sinister method of
payment for a welfare state. It, too, grows in popularity as
the demands increase for services that aren’t affordable.
Although this appears to be a convenient and cheap way to pay
the bills, the economic consequences of lost employment, inflated
prices, and economic dislocation make the long-term consequences
much more severe than paying as we go. Not only is this costly
in terms of national wealth, it significantly contributes to
the political chaos and loss of liberty that accompany the death
throes of a doomed democracy.


This does not mean that direct taxes won’t
be continuously raised to pay for out-of-control spending. In
a democracy, all earned wealth is assumed to belong to the government.
Therefore any restraint in raising taxes, and any tax cuts or
tax credits, are considered “costs” to government.
Once this notion is established, tax credits or cuts are given
only under condition that the beneficiaries conform to the democratic
consensus. Freedom of choice is removed, even if a group is merely
getting back control of that which was rightfully theirs in the
first place.


Tax-exempt status for various groups is not
universal but is conditioned on whether their beliefs and practices
are compatible with politically correct opinions endorsed by
the democratic majority. This concept is incompatible with the
principles of private-property ownership and individual liberty.
By contrast, in a free society all economic and social decision-making
is controlled by private property owners without government intrusion,
as long as no one is harmed in the process.


Confusion Regarding Democracy


The vast majority of the American people have
come to accept democracy as a favorable system and are pleased
with our efforts to pursue Wilson’s dream of “making
the world safe for democracy
.” But the goals of pure
democracy and that of a constitutional republic are incompatible.
A clear understanding of the difference is paramount, if we are
to remain a free and prosperous nation.


There are certain wonderful benefits in recognizing
the guidance that majority opinion offers. It takes a consensus
or prevailing attitude to endorse the principles of liberty and
a Constitution to protect them. This is a requirement for the
rule of law to succeed. Without a consensus, the rule of law
fails.


This does not mean that the majority or public
opinion measured by polls, court rulings, or legislative bodies
should be able to alter the constitutional restraints on the
government’s abuse of life, liberty, and property. But
in a democracy, that happens
— and we know that today
it is happening in this country on a routine basis.


In a free society with totally free markets,
the “votes” by consumers “cast” through their
purchases, or refusals to purchase, determine which businesses
survive and which fail. This is “free-choice” democracy,
and it is a powerful force in producing and bringing about economic
efficiency.


In today’s democracy by decree,
government laws dictate who receives the benefits and who gets
shortchanged. Conditions of employment and sales are taxed and
regulated at varying rates, and success or failure is too often
dependent on government action than by consumers’ “voting”
in the marketplace by their spending habits. Individual consumers
by their decisions should be in charge — not governments
armed with mandates from the majority.


Even a system of free-market money (a redeemable
gold-coin standard) functions through the principle of consumers
always voting or withholding support for that currency. A gold
standard can only work when freely converted into gold coins,
giving every citizen a right to vote on a daily basis for or
against the government money.


The Way Out


It’s too late to avoid the turbulence
and violence that Madison warned about. It has already started.
But it’s important to minimize the damage and prepare the
way for a restoration of the republic. The odds are not favorable,
but not impossible. No one can know the future with certainty.
The Soviet system came to an abrupt end with less violence than
could have ever been imagined at the height of the Cold War.
It was a pleasant surprise.


Interestingly enough, what is needed is a
majority opinion — especially by those who find themselves
in leadership roles, whether political, educational, or in the
media — that rejects democracy- and support the rule of
law within the republic. This majority support is essential for
the preservation of the freedom and prosperity with which America
is identified.


This will not occur until we as a nation once
again understand how freedom serves the interests of everyone.
Henry Grady Weaver, in his 1947 classic, “The Mainspring
of Human Progress,” superbly explains how it works. His
thesis is simple. Liberty permits progress, while government
intervention tends always to tyranny.


Liberty releases creative energy; government
intervention suppresses it. This release of energy was never
greater than in the time following the American Revolution and
the writing of the U.S. Constitution.


Instead of individual activity being controlled
by the government or superstitious beliefs about natural and
mystical events, activity is controlled by the individual. This
understanding recognizes the immense value in voluntary cooperation
and enlightened self-interests.


Freedom requires self-control and moral
responsibility.
No one owes anyone
else anything and everyone is responsible for his or her own
acts. The principle of never harming one’s neighbor, or
never sending the government to do the dirty work, is key to
making the system tend toward peaceful pursuits and away from
the tyranny and majority-induced violence. Nothing short of a
reaffirmation of this principle can restore the freedoms once
guaranteed under the Constitution. Without this, prosperity for
the masses is impossible, and as a nation we become more vulnerable
to outside threats.


In a republic, the people are in charge. The
Constitution provides strict restraints on the politicians, bureaucrats
and the military. Everything the government is allowed to do
is only done with explicit permission from the people or the
Constitution. Today, it’s the opposite. The American people
must get permission from the government for their every move,
whether it’s use of their own property or spending their
own money.


Even the most serious decision, such as going
to war, is done while ignoring the Constitution and without a
vote of the people’s representatives in the Congress. Members
of the global government have more to say about when American
troops are put in harm’s way than the U.S. Congress.


The Constitution no longer restrains the government.
The government restrains the people in all that they do. This
destroys individual creative energy, and the “mainspring
of human progress” is lost. The consequences are less progress,
less prosperity, and less personal fulfillment.


A system that rejects voluntary contracts,
enlightened self interest, and individual responsibilities permits
the government to assume these responsibilities. And the government
officials become morally obligated to protect us from ourselves,
attempting to make us better people and setting standards for
our personal behavior. That effort is already in full swing.
But if this attitude prevails, liberty is lost.


When government assumes the responsibility
for individuals to achieve excellence and virtue, it does so
at the expense of liberty, and must resort to force and intimidation.
Standards become completely arbitrary, depending on the attitude
of those in power and the perceived opinion of the majority.
Freedom of choice is gone.


This leads to inevitable conflicts with the
government dictating what one can eat, drink or smoke. One group
may promote abstinence, the other tax-supported condom distribution.
Arguments over literature, prayer, pornography, and sexual behavior
are endless. It is now not even permissible to mention the word
“God” on public property.


A people who allows its government to set
personal moral standards, for all non-violent behavior, will
naturally allow it to be involved in the more important aspects
of spiritual life. For instance, there are tax deductions for
churches that are politically correct, but not for those whose
beliefs that are considered out of the mainstream. Groups that
do not meet the official politically correct standards are more
likely to be put on a “terrorist” list. This arbitrary
and destructive approach to solving difficult problems must be
rejected if we ever hope to live again in a society where the
role of government is limited to that of protecting liberty.


The question that I’m most often asked
when talking about this subject is, “Why do our elected
leaders so easily relinquish liberty and have such little respect
for the Constitution?” The people of whom I speak are convinced
that liberty is good and big government is dangerous. They are
also quite certain that we have drifted a long way away from
the principles that made America great, and their bewilderment
continuously elicits a big “Why?”


There’s no easy answer to this and no
single explanation. It involves temptation, envy, greed, and
ignorance, but worst of all, humanitarian zeal.


Unfortunately, the greater the humanitarian
outreach, the greater the violence required to achieve it. The
greater the desire to perform humanitarian deeds through legislation,
the greater the violence required to achieve it. Few understand
this.


There are literally no limits to the good
deeds that some believe need to be done. Rarely does anyone question
how each humanitarian act by government undermines the essential
element of all human progress: individual liberty.


Failure of government programs prompts more
determined efforts, while the loss of liberty is ignored or rationalized
away. Whether it’s the war against poverty, drugs, terrorism,
or the current Hitler of the day, an appeal to patriotism is
used to convince the people that a little sacrifice of liberty,
here and there, is a small price to pay.


The results, though, are frightening and will
soon become even more so. Poverty has been made worse, the drug
war is a bigger threat than drug use, terrorism remains a threat,
and foreign wars have become routine and decided upon without
congressional approval.


Most of the damage to liberty and the Constitution
is done by men and women of good will who are convinced they
know what is best for the economy, for others, and foreign powers.
They inevitably fail to recognize their own arrogance in assuming
they know what is the best personal behavior for others. Their
failure to recognize the likelihood of mistakes by central planners
allows them to ignore the magnitude of a flawed central government
directive, compared to an individual or a smaller unit of government
mistake.


C. S. Lewis had an opinion on this subject:



Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised
for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may
be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral
busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep,
his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment
us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so
with the approval of their own conscience.


A system that is based on majority vote rather
than the strict rule of law encourages the few who thrive on
power and exerting authority over other people’s lives,
unlike the many driven by sincere humanitarian concerns. Our
current system rewards those who respond to age-old human instincts
of envy and greed as they gang up on those who produce.


Those individuals who are tempted by the offer
of power are quick to accommodate those who are the most demanding
of government-giveaway programs and government contracts. These
special-interest groups notoriously come from both the poor and
the rich, while the middle class is required to pay.


It’s not just a coincidence that, in
the times of rapid monetary debasement, the middle class
suffers the most from the inflation and job losses that monetary
inflation brings. When inflation is severe, which it will become,
the middle class can be completely wiped out. The stock market
crash gives us a hint as to what is likely to come as this country
is forced to pay for the excesses sustained over the past 30
years while operating under a fiat monetary system.


Eric Hoffer, the longshoreman philosopher,
commented on this subject as well: “Absolute power corrupts
even when exercised for humane purposes. The benevolent despot
who sees himself as a shepherd of the people still demands from
others the submissiveness of sheep
.”


Good men driven by a desire for benevolence
encourage the centralization of power.

The corruptive temptation of power is made worse when domestic
and international interventions go wrong and feed into the hate
and envy that invade men’s souls when the love of liberty
is absent.


Those of good will who work to help the downtrodden
do so not knowing they are building a class of rulers who will
become drunk with their own arrogance and lust for power. Generally
only a few in a society yield to the urge to dictate to others,
and seek power for the sake of power and then abuse it.


Most members of society are complacent and
respond to propaganda, but they unite in the democratic effort
to rearrange the world in hopes of gaining benefits through coercive
means and convince themselves they are helping their fellow man
as well. A promise of security is a powerful temptation for many.


A free society, on the other hand, requires
that these same desires be redirected. The desire for power and
authority must be over one’s self alone. The desire for
security and prosperity should be directed inward, rather than
toward controlling others. We cannot accept the notion that the
gang solution endorsed by the majority is the only option. Self-reliance
and personal responsibility are crucial.


But there is also a problem with economic
understanding. Economic ignorance about the shortcomings of central
economic planning, excessive taxation and regulations, central
bank manipulation of money, and credit and interest rates is
pervasive in our nation’s capital.



A large number of conservatives now forcefully
argue that deficits don’t matter.


Spending programs never shrink, no matter
whether conservatives or liberals are in charge.


Rhetoric favoring free trade is canceled out
by special-interest protectionist measures.


Support of international government agencies
that manage trade, such as the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO,
and Nafta politicizes international trade and eliminates any
hope that free-trade capitalism will soon emerge.


The federal government will not improve on
its policies until the people coming to Washington are educated
by a different breed of economists than those who dominate our
government-run universities. Economic advisors and most officeholders
merely reflect the economics taught to them. A major failure
of our entire system will most likely occur before serious thought
is given once again to the guidelines laid out in the Constitution.


The current economic system of fiat money
and interventionism (both domestic and international) serves
to accommodate the unreasonable demands for government to take
care of the people. And this, in turn, contributes to the worst
of human instincts: authoritarian control by the few over the
many.


We, as a nation, have lost our understanding
of how the free market provides the greatest prosperity for the
greatest number. Not only have most of us forgotten about the
invisible hand of Adam Smith, few have ever heard of Mises and
Hayek- two individuals who understood exactly why all the economic
ups and downs of the 20th century occurred, as well as the cause
of the collapse of the Soviet Union.


But worst of all, we have lost our faith in
freedom. Materialistic concerns and desire for security drive
all national politics. This trend has sharply accelerated since
9/11.


Understanding the connection between liberty,
prosperity, and security has been lost. The priorities are backwards.
Prosperity and security come from liberty. Peace and the absence
of war come as a consequence of liberty and free trade. The elimination
of ignorance and restraints on do-goodism and authoritarianism
in a civilized society can only be achieved through a contractual
arrangement between the people and the government — in our
case, the U.S. Constitution.


The Constitution was the best ever devised
for releasing the creative energy of a free people while strictly
holding in check the destructive powers of government. Only the
rule of law can constrain those who, by human instinct, look
for a free ride while delivering power to those few, found in
every society, whose only goal in life is a devilish desire to
rule over others.


The rule of law in a republic protects free-market
activity and private-property ownership and provides for equal
justice under the law. It is this respect for law and rights
over government power that protects the mainspring of human progress
from the enemies of liberty.


Communists and other socialists have routinely
argued that the law is merely a tool of the powerful capitalists.
But they have it backwards. Under democracy and fascism, the
pseudo-capitalists write the laws that undermine the Constitution
and jeopardize the rights and property of all citizens. They
fail to realize it is the real law, the Constitution itself,
which guarantees rights and equal justice and permits capitalism,
thus guaranteeing progress.


Arbitrary, ever-changing laws are the friends
of dictators. Authoritarians argue constantly that the Constitution
is a living document, and that rigid obedience to ideological
purity is the enemy we should be most concerned about. They would
have us believe that those who cherish strict obedience to the
rule of law in the defense of liberty are wrong merely because
they demand ideological purity. They fail to mention that their
love of relative rights and pure democracy is driven by a rigid
obedience to an ideology as well.


The issue is never rigid beliefs versus reasonable
friendly compromise. In politics, it’s always competition
between two strongly held ideologies. The only challenge for
men and women of good will is to decide the wisdom and truth
of the ideologies offered.


Nothing short of restoring a republican form
of government with strict adherence to the rule of law, and curtailing
illegal government programs, will solve our current and evolving
problems.


Eventually the solution will be found with
the passage of the Liberty Amendment. Once there is serious debate
on this amendment, we will know that the American people are
considering the restoration of our constitutional republic and
the protection of individual liberty.


You have just read:


AN ADDRESS TO THE U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
BY THE HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS ENTITLED, Sorry, Mr. Franklin,
“We’re All Democrats Now”

January 29, 2003


 


To make this subject perfectly clear, an excellent
example of democracy is a lynch mob. The majority wants to hang
the guy, and the guy to be hanged doesn't. So, they have a vote
and hang the guy. THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRAINTS OF ANY
KIND IN A PURE DEMOCRACY.


 


For additional copies of this booklet, contact
F.R.E.E.


About F R.E.E.


The Foundation for Rational Economics and
Education, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non profit organization dedicated
to individual liberty and free-market economics. F.R.E.E. was
founded by Dr. Paul in 1976, when, as a freshman in the U.S.
Congress, he realized that a better educated and informed public
was our best hope for preserving the limited government our Constitution
proscribes, and thereby securing America’s liberty and prosperity
for the generations that will follow.


Having proposed the first term-limits legislation
in modern history, Dr. Paul left the House in 1984 after four
terms as his bill would have mandated, and expanded the educational
work of F.R.E.E., AN ADDRESS TO THE U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
BY THE HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS

January 29, 2003


Sorry, Mr. Franklin, “We’re All
Democrats Now”
launched the National
Endowment for Liberty to produce the 13-part television series
“At Issue,” and continued to speak out on issues of
public policy at the national level. F.R.E.E. publishes Ron Paul’s
Freedom Report. For more information or to make a tax-deductible
donation to F.R.E.E, contact:



Foundation for Rational Economics and Education

P.O. Box 1776

Lake Jackson, TX 77566

(979) 265-3034


Here is Ron Paul's web page:


www.house.gov/paul/

Read more at www.pacinst.com