Hope still remains for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections - The Carolinian
Democrats should give up their plans for wealth redistribution and government spending. The fact is that Americans today are outraged about the state of the economy, and especially about government spending at all levels. While "hope" and "change" may have been big winners in 2008, with the president profiting politically by threatening to take money from those who have earned it and giving it to those who have not, these messages will not be big winners in 2010. Redistributionist policies have put the economy into worse shape than when Obama took office in January of 2009, with unemployment soaring, and small businesses continually closing their doors. Despite what the president says about the recession being "over," Americans are still facing financial uncertainty at home, and so these policies are just not politically palatable anymore.
Rants & Raves: DCF does no good at tracking unlicensed child care providers | jacksonville.com
... boondoggle whose primary purpose was never better, cheaper health care but a massive redistribution of wealth from producers to non-producers. ...
OpEdNews - Diary: America Will Remember On Election Day
None of them are running on their "progressive achievements" like Health Care Redistribution of Wealth, the $timulu$, Cap & Tax, the Financial Retain and ...
Save us from the super-rich - Times LIVE
It's possible to achieve great equality without putting the Little Red Book under the nation's pillows
Delaware politics: Christine O'Donnell, Glen Urquhart shun debate on environment | delawareonline.com | The News Journal
We must stop this bad policy which is fundamentally wealth and redistribution to the richest corporations.
Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » Environmentalism Has Met the Enemy: Itself
“Sustainable Development,” aka, “responsible development,” is a UN wealth redistribution boondoggle designed to destroy American sovereignty ...
Antidisestablishmentarianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
is a political position that originated in 19th-century Britain in opposition to proposals for the disestablishment of the Church of England, that is, to remove the Anglican Church's status as the state church of England, Ireland and Wales. The word was used by William Gladstone in 1838 in his Church and State, though he changed his position with age, leading to the Irish Church Act 1869 under his administration.
The establishment was maintained in England, but in Ireland the Church of Ireland (Anglican) was disestablished in 1871. In Wales, four Church of England dioceses were disestablished in 1920, subsequently becoming the Church in Wales.
The term has largely fallen into disuse. The question of disestablishment of the Church of England is still current, often tied with the position of the English monarch as "Supreme Governor" of the Church (see Act of Settlement 1701), but there is no popular demand for disestablishment.
The Gospel According to St. Marx
Or, in other words, he was making a case for the redistribution of wealth. I'm sure he got a big shout-out from at least one person in the congregation that ...