[VIDEO] Why Newt tanked in Iowa and can never beat Obama
I am going to describe a candidate for you right now, and I want you to think about whether or not you would support him.
This candidate was for the individual mandate that served as the model for "ObamaCare." He was originally for the TARP bank bailouts before he was against them. He joined with Nancy Pelosi to promote the anti-business "global warming" agenda.
He slammed Paul Ryan's budget plan as "extreme," calling it "right wing social engineering."
You might think I am talking about Mitt Romney. Heck, you might think I'm talking about a liberal Democrat. But I'm not.
That candidate I'm talking about is Newt Gingrich. He is what I like to call a "counterfeit conservative."
And I have barely even scratched the surface!
My campaign team has put together a great video that tells you more about Gingrich and his liberal positions over the years. It tells you how he flip-flopped on a host of important issues.
And it shows, despite his claims, he is simply not a conservative.
You can take a look at the video HERE, which has spread like wildfire across the web, as it's received almost 1 million views!
You might have seen recently that Mr. Gingrich traded on his former political office to land a $1.8 million lobbying contract with Freddie Mac.
Why is this so disturbing?
Because while this out-of-control federal agency, along with Fannie Mae, was ruining the housing market and causing millions of homeowners to lose their homes and life savings, Newt Gingrich was earning millions advising it.
At that same exact time, I was publicly declaring they needed to be stopped before they ruined the economy.
I guess Newt Gingrich and I have a different idea of what to do with federal bureaucracies. I fight to rein them in and shut them down before they can do harm. He pads his personal bank account while they wreck our economy.
While I was fighting environmental extremists, the out-of-control EPA, and the Soros-funded green movement, Newt Gingrich was filming commercials with Nancy Pelosi.
While I was fighting government bailouts, Newt was saying he would have voted FOR them.
Don't be fooled by the words candidates use when they are running for office. Look hard at their records. My record is one of true limited government, anti-Washington, D.C. conservatism.
Newt Gingrich has a long record of liberal appeasement, flip-flopping on key issues, and lobbying for insider millions.
Millions. That's right. Remember the individual mandate I mentioned earlier that Newt supported? His healthcare group received nearly $40 MILLION in contributions from the healthcare industry.
I have rarely seen a candidate who represents so much of what is wrong with Washington and what is wrong with our political system.
We can and must demand better.
We must demand REAL conservative values. We must demand a person who puts faith, family, and freedom ahead of all else. And we must demand a candidate who has remained true to principle his entire career.
I believe I am that candidate, and I ask you to take a look at my Plan to Restore America at www.ronpaul2012.com.
You can tell I mean every word in it -- just as I've meant every word I have said in public life. And that's something that everyone will admit, whether they agree with all of my positions or not.
With me, what you see and hear is what you get. Wouldn't that be a nice change?
I am the only true conservative in the top tier of candidates running for the GOP nomination. And I ask for your support.
Together, we can stop the counterfeit conservatives AND the liberals in the White House. We can take back and Restore America Now.
For Liberty,
Ron Paul
P.S. Whether it's flip-flopping on TARP, supporting the individual mandate that served as a model for "ObamaCare," joining with Nancy Pelosi in support of the global-warming crowd's radical agenda, or making millions off of Freddie Mac as it helped destroy our economy, Newt Gingrich is trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
He's what I call a "counterfeit conservative."
Here's an ad my campaign put together explaining his record of supporting liberal policies. Please take a moment to watch it.
So please click here to make your most generous contribution so my campaign has the resources necessary to blitz the airwaves in the coming primary and caucus states with the message of Newt Gingrich's serial hypocrisy.
Homosexual Lobby launches newest group
Yet another pro-homosexual group has been formed in order to force the radical Homosexual Agenda on the rest of America.
The new group “Freedom to Work” is mobilizing towards one single purpose: Passage of the Gay Bill of Special Rights.
They’re not even trying to hide it.
Of course Freedom to Work has disguised the danger of their real agenda by claiming they are only fighting for fairness in the workplace for everyone.
But you and I know better.
Public Advocate has been fighting the Gay Bill of Special Rights for more than a decade, and we know what passage of this bill would mean to our workplace.
Employers, both public AND private, would be forced to hire and prevented from firing anyone who claims to be homosexual, bisexual, or even transsexual.
Riding on the momentum of their recent victory repealing “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” the radical Homosexual Lobby is now re-using that same strategy to double-up their effort to pass the Gay Bill of Special Rights.
In addition to raising a ton of money –- which is never a problem for the Homosexaul Lobby -- they are rapidly building up a massive base of homosexual activists who will go out across the country and spin their tales of workplace woes.
And the scary part is that it could work. When faced with this onslaught of “tears,” average American citizens might just trick themselves into believing it.
They just might believe the crocodile tears... they might believe that all this bill will do is make things fair...
But what it will really do is create a super-class of citizens.
Even if they can’t pass this bill through Congress, they are still going to push fifty different versions of it at the state-level.
This fight will soon be everywhere.
Freedom to Work is a dangerous group. The radical Homosexual Lobby has put all their best eggs in this basket and they won’t quit until the government gives them the superior status they believe they are entitled to.
Or until we make them go away.
The Homosexual Agenda is worming its way into every part of our culture: our children’s classrooms, our military, our institution of marriage... even our nation’s Girl Scouts for goodness sake.
And the Homosexual Lobby will not be satisfied until every man, woman, and child in America recognizes homosexuality as a “natural, wholesome American lifestyle.”
Public Advocate has stood in the gap for so long, holding off their advance; the radical Homosexual Lobby has grown sick and tired of failure.
So they are making this one aggressive push...
In the days ahead, I will be asking you to help me hold our ground in this fight.
For the Family,
Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States
Obama sued over indefinite detention and torture of Americans act — RT
U.S. President Barack Obama at the White House in Washington January 13, 2012 (Reuters / Kevin Lamarque)
In the past, journalist Chris Hedges has worked for NPR, The New York Times and the Christian Science Monitor. In his latest endeavor, however, he is teaming up with an unlikely pair: a couple of attorneys that will help him take on the president.
US President Barack Obama is the target of a suit filed by Pulitzer Prize-winner Hedges, and the reasoning seems more than obvious to him. The decision to take the commander-in-chief to court comes as a response to President Obama’s December 31 signing of the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, a legislation that allows the US military to detain American citizens indefinitely at off-site torture prisons like Guantanamo Bay.
Obama amended the NDAA with a signing statement on New Year's Eve, insisting that while the Act does indeed give him the power to detain his own citizens indefinitely without charge, that doesn’t mean he will do so. Specifically, Obama wrote that his administration “will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens.” Under another piece of legislation, however, the government is being granted the right to suspend citizenship of any American if the Enemy Expatriation Act joins the ranks of the NDAA as an atrocious act approved by the president.
“Once again, you just have to be accused of supporting hostilities which could be defined any way the government sees fit. Then the government can strip your citizenship and apply the indefinite detention section of the NDAA without the benefit of a trial,” journalist Stephen Foster Jr. wrote earlier this month of the Act.
In a blog post published on Monday to TruthDig.com, Hedges announces his effort to take Obama to court, and says his team of attorneys will challenge the president over the legality of the Authorization for Use of Military Force, a provision promised under the NDAA.
In his explanation, Hedges says the signing signals “a catastrophic blow to civil liberties.”
“I spent many years in countries where the military had the power to arrest and detain citizens without charge,” writes Hedges. “I have been in some of these jails. I have friends and colleagues who have ‘disappeared’ into military gulags. I know the consequences of granting sweeping and unrestricted policing power to the armed forces of any nation. And while my battle may be quixotic, it is one that has to be fought if we are to have any hope of pulling this country back from corporate fascism.”
Like other NDAA opponents, Hedges addresses in his explanation the issue that vague verbiage throughout the legislation creates an almost open-ended scenario for the government to grab anyone in America and put them behind bars. Instead, rather, the legislation leaves American authorities to go after anyone it can use the Act to attack.
As an international correspondent and world-renowned journalist, Hedges has traveled the globe and says he has been put in some hairy situations. Under the NDAA, he says, he might as well be considered a war criminal in the eyes of America.
Under NDAA, the military can enforce indefinite detention on anyone “who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States.” As Hedges and others point out, groups such as “associated forces” are never defined, nor are determinations like “substantially supported.”
“I have had dinner more times than I can count with people whom this country brands as terrorists,” writes Hedges. “But that does not make me one.” Regardless, any affiliation with a group branded as such could lead authorities to leap to such conclusions.
Everyone from presidential candidate Ron Paul to the American Civil Liberties Union have questioned Obama’s intentions in signing the NDAA, but Hedge’s lawsuit is the first legal filing lobbed at the president. Regardless of what the president intends by putting the NDAA into law, ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero wrote, "Obama's action … is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law.”
Hedges thinks he knows what those intentions are, however.
“I suspect the real purpose of this bill is to thwart internal, domestic movements that threaten the corporate state,” says Hedges. “The definition of a terrorist is already so amorphous under the Patriot Act that there are probably a few million Americans who qualify to be investigated if not locked up.” When that piece of legislation is coupled with NDAA, the end result could be catastrophic.
“I suspect it passed because the corporations, seeing the unrest in the streets, knowing that things are about to get much worse, worrying that the Occupy movement will expand, do not trust the police to protect them,” concludes Hedges. “They want to be able to call in the Army. And now they can.”
Write in or Republican, I will only vote for Ron Paul! Take the pledge! | causes.com
This cause is important so that we do not lose our freedoms under the Constitution, which some of those freedoms were already lost under the Patriot Act, NDAA and The Enemy Expatriation Act.
These laws need to be repealed, and the only one that will stand and do it is Ron Paul. So take the pledge to vote for Ron Paul as President of the United States of America
Write in or Republican, I will only vote for Ron Paul! Take the pledge!
Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited, constitutional government.To spread the message, visit and promote the following websites:
http://www.RonPaul.com
http://Store.RonPaul.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.com
http://www.WhyRonPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulCountry.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com… Read More
http://www.causes.com/causes/647275-write-in-or-republican-i-will-only-vote-f...
Mitt Romney not a natural-born citizen?
Some point to his father's birth in Mexico, grandparents citizenship
- Gaskell Romney was born Sept. 22, 1871, in St. George, Washington County, in the Utah Territory;
- Anna Amelia Pratt Romney was born May 6, 1876, in Salt Lake City, in the Utah Territory.
“In the early stages of the 1968 presidential campaign this question became increasingly urgent, because Governor George Romney of Michigan was a leading contender for the Republican nomination. Governor Romney was born to American citizens in a Mormon colony in Chihuahua, Mexico, and came to the United States with his parents when he was five.”
“The withdrawal of Governor Romney has ended the possibility that clarification would emerge as a result of his candidacy.”
“The clause [Article 2, Section 1] did emerge from the constitutional woodwork when, in 1968, Governor George Romney of Michigan, born in Mexico to American parents, was in pursuit of the Republican presidential nomination. Romney quickly dismissed concerns of potential presidential ineligibility by asserting natural-born status on the grounds that both his parents were American citizens. While Romney’s political pursuits produced temporary debate as to the exact meaning of “natural-born,” upon his fading, the issue paled in the political arena as well.”
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.
Christian Persecution Coming To America
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity despite the almost universal claim that it is. Roman Catholicism is the Synagogue of Satan, an earthly counterfeit of the Kingdom of Christ in order to deceive God's people. The Papacy is the Biblical and historical Antichrist and he "reigneth over the kings of the earth". This explains why our rights are being taken away by our own government. Our government serves the Papacy, not the people! And the Papacy is ready to conduct a global Inquisition and to use the governments and the militaries of the world to conduct it. This is nothing new. This literally defines history. The Papacy has always used the governments of the world and their militaries to subjugate and to extirpate and to annihilate God's TRUE people. The New World Order is simply the restoration of the Old World Order. There's nothing new about it at all. And there's virtually no excuse for anybody to be deceived. History and the Bible leave no other possibility than that the Vatican is in total control and is about to do what she has always done, but on a global scale.
This video seems to implicate Communism and Islam, when in fact they are both creations of Rome. In this clip, Paul Washer tells the God's honest truth. But sadly, he never puts the blame where it belongs. He never once mentions the Vatican or the Pope. Only in the latter part of this video does the host implicate the Papacy, and then only weakly. But Daniel chapter 2 tells it like it is. So does history. And Revelation 17 confirms it. Nowhere in the Bible is there a more perfect description of the Roman Catholic Cult and the Papacy's control over the governments of the world. And their purpose is to make war against the Lamb of God, Christ! How does the Papacy and the kings of the earth make war against the Lamb of God? They make war against His people! History is repleat with innumerable examples of this and most of us will live to see our own blood shed by the Papacy and the kings of the earth as did the Waldenses, the Huguenots, the Lollards, the Albigenses, the Hussites, the Anabaptists, the Orthodox, the Protestants, the Muslims, the Buddhists, and the Jews. And American Catholics won't be spared either. Rome historically kills her own in order to achieve plausible deniability.
Listen to Inquisition Update M-F at 10AM Central on www.firstamendmentradio.com. Listen to the 5-day FREE audio archives at http://libertyarchives.com/.
"The Truth seems strange only because we've been indoctrinated with a fiction." The fiction is that the Papacy is the Vicar of Christ, a man of God, when the Bible clearly describes him as "the man of sin" "the son of perdition". He is the Biblical and historical ANTICHRIST!
Tom Friess
Inquisition Update
www.inquisitionupdate.org