U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
Exclusive: Court Subpoena for Obama’s Original Birth Certificate Served to Hawaii Health Department
U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
by Sharon Rondeau
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii issued and served a subpoena on July 5, 2011 to the director of the Hawaii Health Department for Obama's original birth certificate
(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”
original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.
The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.
The designated place of production is noted as:
Health Department
State of HI
1250 Punchbowl str. room 325
Honolulu, HI 96813
Above the date, the following text appears:
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.
The subpoena is signed by a deputy clerk as evidenced by an underline appearing beneath that term under the signature line. It is dated “0705.2011″ just above the signature.
A second page titled “Proof of Service” reads:
This subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any) Loretta Fuddy
was received by me on (date) 0705.2011
A box is checked and the following preprinted text states:
I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:
and the lines are completed with the following:
by certified mail return receipt sent to Attorney General of HI, 485 South King str, room 200, Honolulu, HI 96813 on (date) 07.05.2011; or
The checkbox and line below are blank.
Zeroes appearing on lines with dollar signs indicate that there are no fees charged for the service.
A final statement reads:
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date: 07.05.2011
The server’s signature appears in cursive writing and is printed on the line below. It is stamped with the following below the process server’s signature and printed name:
Law Offices of Orly Taitz, Esq.
29639 Santa Margarita Pkwy. Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Proof of Service of the Subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Hawaii to the Health Department Director and the Hawaii Attorney General
Envelope in which Dr. Orly Taitz received a copy of the subpoena and its second page, which is the Proof of Service document
Loretta Fuddy and Dr. Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health, had previously refused Taitz’s request to release Obama’s original birth certificate, citing concerns for “privacy.” Taitz responded to Onaka’s refusal with a letter copied to several congressmen, putative Attorney General Eric Holder, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, and the statement:
…we have an individual with a forged birth certificate and an invalid Social Security number usurping the position of the US president and Commander in Chief of the whole US military. Your and Ms. Fuddy’s refusal to provide access to the original birth certificate can be viewed as aiding and abetting to uttering of a forged document and elections fraud. Based on all of the above, I am respectfully requesting an administrative review of my appeal and granting access to the original document in question. If the appeal is not granted within 30 days, I will be taking further action.
On April 27, 2011, the White House released what it claimed was a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate on television and the internet. However, numerous document examiners, typesetting experts, and graphics consultants have come forward to state in formal presentations and reports that the image presented to the public is a poor forgery.
Related Posts:
No comments:
Post a Comment